Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Technical > Weapons Systems Tech.

Weapons Systems Tech. Technology behind the weapons and systems within aircraft.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-22-2008, 07:52 PM   #1
Member
 
Fokker D21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 62
Favorite gun armament of WWII aircraft

After playing numerous flight simulators I noticed that bigger guns on aircraft usually are not that much more powerful modelled than smaller ones. So I decided to read more about the subject. The best book I read about this is: Flying Guns of World War II. One of the most interesting things in this book is a formula for calculating gun strength.

The authors base their formula on momentum instead of kinetic and chemical energy because kinetic energy overstates the speed of the projectile and chemical energy is to complex to be compared with kinetic energy.

I took the challenge to make my own formula. See my website: [URL="http://members.tele2.nl/harmstolk/gunpower.htm"]

My question to the other forum members is:
1) Do you think my and/or Williams/Gustin formula approaches historical accuracy?
2) What is your favorite gun armament of WWII and why?
__________________
Ceteris Paribus (meaning everything else is considered to have no influence on our investigation)

http://members.tele2.nl/harmstolk/gunpower.htm
Fokker D21 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2008, 08:42 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,765
Hi Fokker,

>See my website: Back to my homepage

Looks good! :-)

I'd like to see a table comparing the individual guns, if possible sorted by efficiency. I'd also include the mass of rounds plus drums/belts into the efficiency comparison, as that will give a better impression of the entire weapons system.

For my comparison, I have simply used total energy. The additional factors you introduce are entirely arbitary - a solid round piercing through aircraft skind wastes a proportion of its energy just like an explosive round, and I don't think it's possible to tell generically which type of loss is higher.

Oh, and I noticed you used the term "effective range" - what's your definition of that term?

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)
HoHun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2008, 08:54 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
comiso90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 3,294
Favorite gun armament of WWII aircraft..

Depends on the mission and theater.

If your hunting 4 engine bombers... gotta have cannons.
If your going after fighters... .50 is my choice
If I'm shredding Japanese aircraft, I may even want 10 or 12 .303 brownings..
__________________


http://www.BOOKSonWAR.com/
.
comiso90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 12:18 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
joy17782's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: logan ohio
Posts: 279
comiso i have too agree with you there on your picks , maybe a few more 303 lol !!!!!!
joy17782 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 08:38 AM   #5
“Archive”
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
Read this link on aircraft guns also. Lot of info in there provided by Hohun.

http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/wea...ons-11037.html (Centerline Guns configurations)
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 09:39 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
toffigd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gdansk, PL
Posts: 316
"If I'm shredding Japanese aircraft, I may even want 10 or 12 .303 brownings"

Where would you put theme? You'd need at least biplane Spitfire Mk.I with double A wing - 16x.303!
__________________
Pozdrawiam
toffigd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 10:28 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
ToughOmbre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,233
Like the P-38 armament, a 20mm and four .50s in the nose.

TO
__________________


“Let's get Enterprise and Hornet turned into the wind."
ToughOmbre is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 11:30 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 3,655
I prefer the Whirlwind, 4 x 20mm in the nose, nasty
Glider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 11:44 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
comiso90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 3,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by toffigd View Post
"If I'm shredding Japanese aircraft, I may even want 10 or 12 .303 brownings"

Where would you put theme? You'd need at least biplane Spitfire Mk.I with double A wing - 16x.303!
Hurricane XII
Canadian-built variant. Single-seat fighter and fighter-bomber. Powered by a 1,300 hp (969 kW) Packard Merlin 29. Initially armed with 12 0.303 inch (7.7 mm) machine guns, but this was later changed to four 20 mm cannon


Hawker Hurricane - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________


http://www.BOOKSonWAR.com/
.
comiso90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 02:47 PM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 981
Gimme a Sturmbock Fw 190 A-8/R2; I'll take 2 30mm Mk 108's, 2 20mm MG 151/20's, and two MG 17's any day.
SoD Stitch is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 02:51 PM   #11
Minister of Whoopass
 
lesofprimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 17,506
Same here Stich, unless I was going up top to handle P-51's, then lose the 30mms and stay with the 4x20mm and 2xMG17s...
__________________
My IL2 Video Tribute to My Grandfather: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk

lesofprimus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 03:28 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Aquincum, Pannonia Prima
Posts: 784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fokker D21 View Post

My question to the other forum members is:
1) Do you think my and/or Williams/Gustin formula approaches historical accuracy?
Tony`s formula is one approach to a very complex problem, and he readily admits that it has weaknesses; IMHO the greatest weakness is that it bases the projectiles 'destructive power' (for the lack of a better word) on Kinetic energy, and ie. HE shells only get their KE multiplied to represent Chemical Energy, and the two has little to do with each other. To illustrate with an example, a hand granade kills you all the same wheter it explodes sitting on the ground, flying in the air or hits you in the stomach after thrown and then explodes. There is no connection.

But as said, it`s an extremely complex subject, depending on where the projectile hits (ie. if the bullet passes through the wingtip, the same amount of KE will be transferred, ie. the one needed to penetrate through, wheter we speak of a high velocity or low velocity round of similiar calibre), what it hits etc.

I fear its simply impossible to give back the effect with a single number.

Quote:
2) What is your favorite gun armament of WWII and why?
Late La 7 and Yak 3 with the pair or triple 20mm cannons. Its an excellent, light, compact cannon with high rate of fire and high velocity, the 20mm is simply the best all around armament and all of it is centered in the nose.

Its a sexy combination of a neat and deadly package. Of course there were some monstrosities, but I prefer the reasonable package.
__________________
__________________________________________________

http://kurfurst.org
http://kurfurst.freeforums.org/index.php
Kurfürst is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 03:32 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
magnocain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 394
How about 6x50 cal.s and 2x 30mm cannons.
__________________
Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets.
--Napoleon Bonaparte--
magnocain is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 03:56 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,283
Why shred a Japanese airplane with .30's?

Go with the 10 .50's!!!!!

Plus you can also shred Japanese ships with the 50 cals.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 04:38 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
rochie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: billingham nr middlesbrough uk
Posts: 3,115
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoD Stitch View Post
Gimme a Sturmbock Fw 190 A-8/R2; I'll take 2 30mm Mk 108's, 2 20mm MG 151/20's, and two MG 17's any day.
i'll agree with that much better to be sat behind that lot than in front looking down the barrels
__________________

"We're not easily frightened.
Also we know how hard it is for an army to cross the Channel — the last little corporal to try it came a cropper.
So don't threaten or dictate to us until you're marching up Whitehall! ...and even then we won't listen!"
quote from B.O.B movie


rochie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118