![]() |
| |||||||
| Weapons Systems Tech. Technology behind the weapons and systems within aircraft. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
| Help on .50 cal incendiary rounds Does anyone have a god link on how US .50 cal incendiary rounds are made... or how white phosphorous might be made inert or safely removed from such a round? I ask as part of my research for a writing project. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member | Honestly I dont think the WP could be safely removed from the bullet. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 273
| The drawing shown is of an M8 API, in which the tip in front of the armour-piercing core is filled with a small quantity of incendiary material. There was also a .50 M1 incendiary, which was a scaled-up and simplified version of the British Dixon ("De Wilde") .303. This consisted of four elements: the bullet jacket which enclosed the whole bullet except for the base; a hollow steel sleeve fitting inside the jacket for the central helf of its length; the incendiary mixture which filled all of the nose, plus the inside of the steel sleeve; and a base plug, usually of lead. To get at the incendiary material while preserving the appearance of the bullet, it would be necessary to drill through the base plug. This would be risky as you might ignite the material. I also don't know how you'd get it out. Incidentally, they didn't use WP but a mix of 50% barium nitrate and 50% powdered aluminium/magnesium alloy (known as IM#11).
__________________ Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Adelaide Sth. Aust.
Posts: 12,515
| Mmmm....interesting info...
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Senior Member | Thanks Tony and this... Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |