ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

MG 151/20 Tracers

Weapons Systems Tech. Discuss MG 151/20 Tracers in the Technical forums; As far as I know, two main tracer solutions were developed and used for MG 151/20: a) L’spur (Leucht spur) ...

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    57
    Country
    Italy

    MG 151/20 Tracers

    As far as I know, two main tracer solutions were developed and used for MG 151/20: a) L’spur (Leucht spur) for daylight-fighting and b) Gl’spur (Glimm spur) for night-fighting. But, I confess, I haven’t been able to have a clear understanding about the following points (*):
    1) tracer aspect (color of the trails due to light and/or smoke). As to light and/or smoke, an unclear point is if, in the intention of the designers, the tracing function had to be obtained via the light (smoke) and the smoke (light) was just a “secondary by-product”.
    2) trace space/lenght features (nominal delay(no trace inital distance), if any, and nominal duration/length). May be these features were not unique but a couple of options were available in different times, during the WWII. As to trace length/duration, I ‘ve heard that a “shortened trace” version was developed (at least for L’spur but, maybe, for Gl’spur also): the so called vk. L’spur.

    These questions arise also from looking at Luftwaffe guncamera videos (most of them can be found on youtube etc), where, again, a mixed situation can be observed. Sometimes a clear smoke trail can be seen, whereas other movies show just light and, finally, others situations show light+smoke. Since all movies are b&w non clue about colors, of course. Moreover, I don't know if the smoke in the footages is actually smoke or, at least in some situations, is something depending on the altitude, humidity (condensation?) etc. rather than on an intended "design feature" or “design variant” of the tracer.



    (*)Before asking I made attempts to see if documented answers to my questions could be found elsewhere.

    Thanks in advance for any contribution

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    97
    Country
    Canada
    Different info from different sources:

    20-mm Tracer: bright white, pale green or yellow, 1.8 seconds
    20-mm High-Explosive Tracer: bright white, pale green or yellow, 6.0, 1.4 and 2 seconds
    20-mm High-Explosive Incendiary Tracer: pale green or yellow, 3.0 seconds

    As far as smoke is concerened, when you see thick, white smoke in german guncamera footage I'd assume it was the yellow phosphorous from 7.92 mm API rounds.

    A lot of tracers do of course produce smoke.. however, I think this has more to do with certain priming compositions, certain altitudes/locales, and certain chemical impurities than with a reliable, constant plume of smoke emitted from a burning tracer. I have a British test of all sorts of captured italian ammunition and generally it can be seen that brand new tracers (just a few months old) produced a lot of smoke. Tracers that were about three to six (I think, can't remember exact figures.. maybe it was three to twelve or six to twelve...) months old produced no smoke.. and as the tracers aged further than that, they began producing more smoke again.
    Last edited by Greyman; 09-10-2011 at 02:28 AM.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    57
    Country
    Italy
    Hi Greyman thank you!!! Very much appreciated. Both the info and your comments are valuable and make a lot of sense.
    Coming back to 20mm, just a "confirmation" question: is the "bright white" referred to L'spur tracers and the "pale green or yellow" to Gl'spur? And "pale green or yellow" means that both variants vere developed and used?
    Another point regarding the duration for tracers with three duration options: which kind (if any) of cartridge labelling (words or colours) told the user which variant he had in his hands (normal duration, the shortened version and the long burning one or normal, shortened and ultra shortened)?
    Finally, could you tell me something about what the British test you mentioned reports about 7,7mm and 12,7mm italian breda-safat tracers?
    Thanks again in advance
    Last edited by bruno_; 09-10-2011 at 05:48 AM.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    97
    Country
    Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by bruno_ View Post
    Coming back to 20mm, just a "confirmation" question: is the "bright white" referred to L'spur tracers and the "pale green or yellow" to Gl'spur? And "pale green or yellow" means that both variants vere developed and used?
    Not entirely sure. Unfortunately I didn't really pay attention to day/night information when collecting. Either both and lumped it all in or just the day info.

    Quote Originally Posted by bruno_ View Post
    Another point regarding the duration for tracers with three duration options: which kind (if any) of cartridge labelling (words or colours) told the user which variant he had in his hands (normal duration, the shortened version and the long burning one or normal, shortened and ultra shortened)?
    These aren't necessarily different options, just different figures I have from different sources. Same with the colours. The changes could be standardized changes over time as well.
    made-up-example: 6 second white tracers used in 1941, production changing to pale green 2 second trace in 1943

    Quote Originally Posted by bruno_ View Post
    Finally, could you tell me something about what the British test you mentioned reports about 7,7mm and 12,7mm italian breda-safat tracers?
    Thanks again in advance
    The British were generally unimpressed, but overall approved them for use in British weapons. They were impressed with the 20-mm Breda tracers but in testing their performance seemed very unreliable and inconsistent.

    That said it seems to me the British were seldom impressed with the tracers of any other country, so either they were in the lead in that department or they just like they way they did things.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    57
    Country
    Italy
    Ok, understood. Thanks again for your answers

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 177
    Last Post: 09-09-2010, 09:21 AM
  2. Focke-Wulf Fw 190A/D and outer wing cannon
    By paradoxguy in forum Aviation
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-22-2009, 06:35 AM
  3. Which was harder to shoot down, a P-47D or a FW 190A?
    By Soundbreaker Welch? in forum Polls
    Replies: 113
    Last Post: 12-11-2008, 05:22 PM
  4. CANNON OR MACHINE GUN? Pt. 1
    By syscom3 in forum Aviation
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 04-13-2006, 02:02 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181