![]() |
| |||||||
| Weapons Systems Tech. Technology behind the weapons and systems within aircraft. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 273
| WW2 Aircraft Gun Specifications Hello All, I remember seeing a spreadsheet that had details on many of the aircraft guns in WW2. This was intended for the CFS 1% aircraft. Does anyone still have that spreadsheet. The data I am looking for is the ammunition weight with disintegrating link belts. Thanks in advance. - Ivan. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,765
| Hi Ivan, >The data I am looking for is the ammunition weight with disintegrating link belts. I haven't seen the spreadsheet you're talking about, but here is the data I have (from RLM data sheets for the Luftwaffe weapons and some weight and balance sheets for the Allied weapons). If you find more, your additions would be appreciated! MK 108, 30x90RB: 585 g MK 103, 30x184B: 920 g MG 151/20 (MX), 20x82: 213,7 g MG 151/20, 20x82: 213,7 g Hispano V, 20x110: 246 g VYa-23, 23x152B: 230 g Hispano II, 20x110: 246 g MG-FF, 20x80RB: 338,3 g MG 151, 15x96: 182,2 g MG 131, 13x64B: 78 g ,50 Browning M2, 12,7x99: 110 g Browning ,303, 7,7x56R: 30 g MG 17, 7,92x57: 29,2 g (Fractional weights are the result of having different ammunition types mixed according to Luftwaffe practice. The weights here are a representative figure. Note that the data for the MG FF/M includes a fraction of the weight of the 60 round drum ... a bit awkward, but makes for better-though-not-perfect comparisons.) Regards, Henning (HoHun) |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 273
| Hello HoHun, I was actually hoping that someone out there had the spreadsheet. I printed it out years ago but don't know where went. I am having LOTS of trouble verifying the numbers you quote. I just picked one gun, the .50 M2 Browning, that is so common that there should be LOTS of information. You listed a weight of 110 grams which I presume is one round and one link. The ammunition weights I have seen quoted are about 115 to 117.5 grams WITHOUT the link for Ball, Tracer and Incendiary. The book "The Machine Gun" by George Chinn lists a weight of 30.25 pounds for a 100 round link belt for a .50 Cal M2 MG. That works out to slightly over 137 grams per round with its link. This seems pretty close to the quoted weights of ammunition for a P-40E that I found. I was actually hoping to lay hands on a couple rounds of .50 Cal and links to weigh them to resolve the differences. - Ivan. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,765
| Hi Ivan, >You listed a weight of 110 grams which I presume is one round and one link. The ammunition weights I have seen quoted are about 115 to 117.5 grams WITHOUT the link for Ball, Tracer and Incendiary. Many thanks for pointing that out! I can't believe I missed that ... I've been using the 12.7 mm round as a point of reference all the time. Here is a Spitfire load and balance sheet ... it yields data for the 0.303" Browning and the 20 mm Hispano. I'll see if I can find something similar indicating the weight for the 12.7 mm ammunition! Regards, Henning (HoHun) |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,765
| Hi again, >I'll see if I can find something similar indicating the weight for the 12.7 mm ammunition! Here is a P-47 Weight and Balance Sheet ... it seems the ammunition including belting weighed 0.3 lbs per round. Regards, Henning (HoHun) |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: FL
Posts: 1
| Here are weights as given in a WW II era manual. Sorry but no weight for the links are given. Per OS 9-18, November 1942, .50 cal. cartridge weights (approximate), in grains A.P., M2: 1822 A.P., M1: 1869 Ball, M2: 1813 Ball, M1: 1873 (cartridge is limited standard and no longer manufactured) Tracer M2: - (not yet in quantity production) Tracer M1: 1789 Incendiary: - (not given, details classified as confidential) Wikipedia: In many cultures, a grain is a unit of measurement of mass that is based upon the mass of a single seed of a typical cereal. Historically, in Europe, the average masses of wheat and barley grain were used to define units of mass. Since 1958, the grain or troy grain (Symbol: gr) measure has been defined in the International System of Units as precisely 64.79891 milligrams.[1][2] Thus, there are precisely 7,000 grains per avoirdupois pound in the Imperial and U.S. customary units. In fact, the grain is the only unit of mass measure common to the traditional three English mass and weight systems (avoirdupois, Apothecaries’, troy). Moreover, the measure for pearls and diamonds - the pearl grain and the metric grain - are equal to 1/4 of a (metric) carat, i.e. 50 mg (0.77 gr). |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 62
| Ivan1GFP, are you looking for info for Microsoft's Combat Flight Simulator 1? Things like dp values?
__________________ Ceteris Paribus (meaning everything else is considered to have no influence on our investigation) http://members.tele2.nl/harmstolk/gunpower.htm |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 273
| Hello Fokker D21, Yes, I am looking for values for calculating loads for CFS1 flight models. DP values would be nice too, but at the moment, weights are more important. I remember there was a spreadsheet for 1% aircraft out there and was hoping that someone had downloaded it and kept it. I printed at least one copy but can't remember where I left it. I have a hard copy of the Engine parameters sheet and have found errors on that one. Hello Elconaut, Yes I am familiar with grain weights. The are much more intuitive to me than grams. M852 - 168 grain HPBT. My typical load for 150 grain bullets for .30-06 was 48.5 - 49.5 grains of IMR 4895. Hello HoHun, I believe the numbers from your P-47 data sheet matches the weight quote I found fairly closely. Thanks all. - Ivan. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 62
| I don't have load values. But on my website you can find values for Cartridge Power according to a formula designed by Tony Williams and a formula designed by me. The CP values are deliberately multiplied by a factor of 3 because I calculated them for correct DP values in CFS1. CFS1 overestimates the power of rifle calibre guns and underestimates the power of the bigger weapons. To give an example: a Hurricane with 8 Brownings .303 has more firepower than a Hurricane with 4 Hispano's II. To fix this a I kept the dp values for heavy calibre machine guns more or less the same, the rifle calibre goes down, the 20 and 30 mm go up.
__________________ Ceteris Paribus (meaning everything else is considered to have no influence on our investigation) http://members.tele2.nl/harmstolk/gunpower.htm |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 273
| Hello Fokker D21, I guess I know who you are then. I am pleased to virtually meet you. My goal at the moment is to work on flight models. In order to do this, I need accurate weight values for the aircraft. In CFS, this would be the "Zero Fuel Weight". I am looking for numbers for the disposable loads in the aircraft and having an accurate weight for ammunition helps. Per the earlier discussion, There is no point in calculating in the weight of the ammunition drum unless the drum is discarded off the aircraft when it is empty. (Does the same thing apply to links for a bomber's gun stations?) I had not thought that the CP value was really a CFS DP value, but will review the numbers in that light. Thanks. - Ivan. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 273
| Hello again Fokker D21, This may be in the wrong forum, but if you are into CFS1, have you ever tried out the stuff I built? If so, what do you think? - Ivan. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 62
| I'm sorry but I was into CFS 1 some years ago. But by today standards the game is outdated. Furthermore I don't really like the modelled flight behaviour in the game. The Hurricane for instance practically never stalls and can be flown with max stick. Pulling back the stick completely on a Fw 190 means inmediate stall at any speed. I also refuse to believe that any plane is unstable in pitch (no matter how much you reduce or increase throttle to maintain altitude). Watch what happens to a plane with autopilot set to maintain altitude. I tried to tinker with the aircraft variabeles, but they were to complex to understand and cannot solve the above mentioned problems.
__________________ Ceteris Paribus (meaning everything else is considered to have no influence on our investigation) http://members.tele2.nl/harmstolk/gunpower.htm |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 62
| As far as I know the remaining empty links in bombers were taken back to base with the bomber (Italian bombers even had special trays to collect these). Only in emergency (an engine taken out) would all excess weight be tossed overboard.
__________________ Ceteris Paribus (meaning everything else is considered to have no influence on our investigation) http://members.tele2.nl/harmstolk/gunpower.htm |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 273
| Hello Fokker D21. Sounds like you are right regarding discarding links. If that is the case, then from a disposable weight standpoint, the ammunition on a bomber gun station is lighter than the same ammunition on a fighter. BTW, I don't disagree with you regarding CFS stock aircraft. It IS an older simulator, but I believe there are a couple of us that have done some pretty good work on add-on aircraft. I host my stuff at Sim-Outhouse. I believe my flight models are a substantial improvement over the stock ones. Let me know what you think. Also there are a whole bunch of aircraft that I have not yet released yet because I am still working on them. If you are interested, I'll send you some of them as trial only (don't distribute). Aircraft CAN be unstable in pitch, but the problem that you are describing isn't that. It is because the trim effect per notch in the flight model is too small. The autopilot can't adjust the trim fast enough to keep up with aircraft pitch and the result is a divergence. I try to adjust the trim to work with autopilot but the problem there is that if the notches are too large (works with Autopilot), then sometimes the fine tuning to keep the plane absolutely level cannot be done. (Phugoid?) - Ivan. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,765
| Hi Ivan, >Per the earlier discussion, There is no point in calculating in the weight of the ammunition drum unless the drum is discarded off the aircraft when it is empty. In that case, the weight per round for the MG FF is 202 g instead of 338 g. However, that will make all of your calculations more complicated as not every fighter weapon ejected spent links and cartridges. You'll have to find out for every specific installation you're looking at. Regards, Henning (HoHun) |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |