ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

The Synchronized Machine Gun.

World War I Discuss The Synchronized Machine Gun. in the Other Eras forums; I read a copy of the book, "Flying Dutchman" by Anthony Fokker (1931) in which he devotes an entire chapter ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Trentham, Victoria, AU
    Posts
    113
    Country
    Australia

    The Synchronized Machine Gun.

    I read a copy of the book, "Flying Dutchman" by Anthony Fokker (1931) in which he devotes an entire chapter to, "I Invent The Synchronized Machine Gun".
    However, I understand that Fokker's claim has been disputed in recent times. Are there any known references or discussion on this matter?


  2. #2
    Senior Member proton45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    663
    Country
    United States
    I have never heard this before...where did you hear about this?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,766
    Hi Jerryw,

    >However, I understand that Fokker's claim has been disputed in recent times. Are there any known references or discussion on this matter?

    He had just not been disputed in recent times, but even back in WW1.

    This thread shows a 1913 patent on interrupter gear:

    http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/wea...ion-15659.html (RAF guns and ammunition)

    However, the lawsuit against Fokker failed, possibly because his interrupter system would not only interrupt the burst when a propeller blade was in the way, but also continue it when the line of fire was clear again.

    Fokker did however have to pay license fees to August Euler, who had patented the method of mounting a fixed gun parallel to the line of flight and aim it by flying the plane.

    The designer of Fokker's interrupter gear was his employee Heinrich Lübbe, like Fokker one of the original Johannisthal aviation pioneers who was a assdious inventor whose main interest was aircraft armament (which had been the reason for Fokker to hire him).

    I'd be interested in the account Fokker gives of this invention ... "Arado" by Kranzhoff has one photograph with Lübbe and Fokker standing over the cockpit of an Eindecker conducting shooting trials, and another one with Lübbe in front of an Eindecker, explaining the system to a group of aviation officers that includes Oswald Boelcke.

    Regards,

    Henning (HoHun)

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Trentham, Victoria, AU
    Posts
    113
    Country
    Australia
    Proton45,
    Copies of "Flying Dutchman" by Fokker & Gould are readily available from the the ABE BOOKS website.
    The book has been reprinted many times, including paperback versions.
    The 1931 editions have quite a few photos in them.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Trentham, Victoria, AU
    Posts
    113
    Country
    Australia

    Fokker Machine Gun.

    Fokker's account (see below) is extraordinarily at odds with any description of his receiving help from anyone else! He is adamant that he did the whole job on his own and in very short time!

    P.S. The Patent by Franz Schneider was lodged in England in July 1913 as No. 191316,726. It only runs to three pages and can be downloaded free from the Espacenet website. It is written in English.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails The Synchronized Machine Gun.-img.jpg  
    Last edited by jerryw; 01-12-2009 at 08:11 PM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,766
    Hi Jerryw,

    >Fokker's account (see below) is extraordinarily at odds with any description of his receiving help from anyone else! He is adamant that he did the whole job on his own and in very short time!

    Interesting ... however, Lübbe was clearly Fokker's armament man, being made director of the Fokker-Waffenfabrik in Berlin in 1916, and he certainly was an innovative designer as he came up with a 12-barrel Gatling gun for aircraft use in 1918, and a 20 mm aircraft cannon in the early 1930s. He also held many patents on military and civilian inventions in the inter-war period.

    Kranzhoff notes "The share in the remarkable profits from the production of about 42000 sets of synchronizers made it possible for him [Lübbe] to found the 'Versuchsanstalt für Waffen- und Maschinenbau' in Berlin, Potsdamerstraße 27 b in 1919". Unfortunately, he does not note if that was the inventor's share or if Lübbe had a share in the profits due to his management position at the factory producing the synchronizers.

    Below the picture from Kranzhoff's book ... the German subtitle (obviously written by Lübbe's coworker Hebe) is "Fokker, Lübbe and me at the first test". It does at least suggest some close cooperation :-)

    >P.S. The Patent by Franz Schneider was lodged in England in July 1913 as No. 191316,726. It only runs to three pages and can be downloaded free from the Espacenet website. It is written in English.

    Thanks, I'll check it out!

    Regards,

    Henning (HoHun)
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails The Synchronized Machine Gun.-kranzhoff_arado_pic_p13s.jpg  

  7. #7
    Senior Member Marcel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Dordrecht
    Posts
    5,173
    Country
    Netherlands
    Fokker's account (see below) is extraordinarily at odds with any description of his receiving help from anyone else! He is adamant that he did the whole job on his own and in very short time!
    Remember, Anthony Fokker was known for his sheer arrogance and saw no trouble in using others for his own credit!

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Trentham, Victoria, AU
    Posts
    113
    Country
    Australia
    Memo to Henning,
    Can you resize that photo of Fokker and Lubbe A.S.A.P., please. It is far too big for the screen! If you reduce it to about 3.5 inches, it should fit.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Trentham, Victoria, AU
    Posts
    113
    Country
    Australia

    Synchronized Machine Gun.

    Below is an abbreviated version of the Schneider patent concerning a synchronized gun on an aircraft.
    It is very hard to see how the Fokker "invention" differs, in principle, from this patent.
    The other question is, if Fokker had thought he had invented a significant interrupter mechanism, why didn't he file a patent for it? By 1915, he was an experienced designer and manufacturer. He must have been aware of the possible wide-spread use of the device and therefore, the importance of protecting his rights by patent.
    Also worth noting that Schneider's patent lists his location as "Johannisthal near Berlin", the same place that Fokker spent a lot of time during his early flying days.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails The Synchronized Machine Gun.-img.jpg  
    Last edited by jerryw; 01-14-2009 at 10:28 PM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Marcel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Dordrecht
    Posts
    5,173
    Country
    Netherlands
    This is what happens if the system fails. A propeller from a Fokker D.XVI in the Dutch Airforce museum, Soesterberg
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails The Synchronized Machine Gun.-prop.jpg  

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,766
    Hi Marcel,

    >This is what happens if the system fails. A propeller from a Fokker D.XVI in the Dutch Airforce museum, Soesterberg

    Great illustration, thanks a lot!

    One version of Immelmann's death is that his aircraft crashed after a malfunctioning synchronizer gear shot up his propeller, so it seems that this was a realistic danger. (I presume the worst case would be one blade being torn off, as the resulting imbalance would probably destroy the aircraft.)

    Regards,

    Henning (HoHun)

  12. #12
    Senior Member Ferdinand Foch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Stafford Springs, Connecticut
    Posts
    812
    Country
    United States
    Whoa, thanks for the picture Marcel, I would have hate to have been the pilot for that aircraft. Dumb question, though, how (or if they did at all) did the Allies learn to use the syncronized machine gun themselves. Did they invent it on their own, or did they design theirs off of machine guns from captured German planes. Just curious.
    "It is my considered opinion that in the fullness of time history will record the greatness of Michael Collins, and it will be recorded at my expense." -Eamon de Valera.

    "Better to fight for something than live for nothing." -George S. Patton.

    "I don't know what the effect of the men will have on the enemy, but, by god, they frighten me." -Arthur Wellesley.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Marcel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Dordrecht
    Posts
    5,173
    Country
    Netherlands
    Well, I think the pilot was incredible fortunate not to shoot his prop off. I think it was a very short burst
    I thought I read somewhere that they copied it from a captured E.III

  14. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    California City, CA
    Posts
    17
    Country
    United States
    Group,

    I am sure that several people working independently on a problem would come to about the same conclusion. Hence more then one person could rightfully clain to have invented the interrupter gear and be legimite claim.

    Remember that when Folker claimed to have invented the gear, WW I was going on and the government probably seized the rights for their use (So no patents).

    Also remember that information did not travel as fast in early 1900's as it does today. So an invention in Europe may not reach america for a while.

    When I first went into the Air Force, I had a Squadron Commander whose father invented the Cleco. He received no compensation since it was wartime, and then country need the invention.

    Laterrrrrr
    Avn-Tech

  15. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    27
    Country
    United States
    There were several synchronization systems which predated Fokker. Their problems were that they were usually coupled with guns that were difficult or impossible to synchronize by ANY system. The book "Flying Guns" goes into extensive detail on synchronization systems and why some failed and others succeeded.

    Basically, closed bolt, short recoil operated guns are easy to synchronize because the timing of the firing cycle is highly predictable and consistent. Open bolt, delayed blowback, and similar guns are hard to synchronize because of inherent firing delays caused by lock time and bolt travel before a round is fired.

    Easy to Synchronize:
    Maxim based systems (MG08, MG08/15, Vickers, Russian Maxims, etc.)
    Browning/Marlin
    Browning M1919

    Hard or Impossible to Synchronize:
    Schwarzlose
    Revelli
    Lewis
    Hotchkiss

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86