ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 100

Anti-tank weapons

WW2 General Discuss Anti-tank weapons in the World War II - General forums; you guys know what this late war killer job is.... ?...

  1. #16
    the old Sage Erich's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Platonic Sphere
    Posts
    12,538
    Country
    United States
    you guys know what this late war killer job is.... ?

    Attached Images

  2. #17
    Senior Member plan_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    11,984
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Well, Panzerschreck? I don't actually know the difference between the Faust and Schreck...
    "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004

    To those in that club.

  3. #18
    Member Kongo Otto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Augsburg, Germany
    Posts
    37
    Country
    Germany
    Here are a few pics from German anti-tank guns.

    First Picture: Raketenwerfer 43 "Puppchen"



    Second Picture: 12,8cm Pak 43




    Greetings from germany
    Kongo Otto

  4. #19
    Senior Member trackend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Canvey Island, Essex
    Posts
    4,040
    Country
    England
    hi D The Faust one shot hollow charge weapon and the Schreck a German copy of the bazooka
    heres four for the thread I didn't include the sticky bomb as it was not a fired weapon. only the Mauser dates from the 1914-18 war.
    The BOYS was well known for its fantastically vicious kick when fired as was the PIAT.
    The Blacker Bombard was effective but it's mount was heavy and made it very hard to transport even with the legs removed.
    Ive handelled both a Boys and a PIAT which is a beast of thing to **** and needed both feet on the thing to compress the spring.
    Attached Images

  5. #20
    Member Kongo Otto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Augsburg, Germany
    Posts
    37
    Country
    Germany
    Quote Originally Posted by HealzDevo
    I forget what type the two ww1 anti-tank rifles are. Maybe someone can take the picture and find out what they are.
    The smaller one at the Picture is a Soviet PKM Machinegun.It fire 7,62x54R
    (Rimmed Edge) Ammo.It was put into service in the Red Army in 1964.


    Greetings from germany
    Kongo Otto

  6. #21
    Senior Member plan_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    11,984
    Country
    United Kingdom
    The 128mm anti-tank cannon you showed a picture of, Kongo, is a PaK44 128mm not PaK43 - as there was no PaK43 128mm. PaK43 was an 88mm cannon.
    "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004

    To those in that club.

  7. #22
    Member Kongo Otto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Augsburg, Germany
    Posts
    37
    Country
    Germany
    Quote Originally Posted by plan_D
    The 128mm anti-tank cannon you showed a picture of, Kongo, is a PaK44 128mm not PaK43 - as there was no PaK43 128mm. PaK43 was an 88mm cannon.
    Thats correct.Was my mistake.I´m sorry.


    Greetings from Germany
    Kongo Otto

  8. #23
    Senior Member trackend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Canvey Island, Essex
    Posts
    4,040
    Country
    England
    Thats alright Kongo we can't all be as perfect as old Plan D

  9. #24
    Senior Member plan_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    11,984
    Country
    United Kingdom
    I study tanks, and naturally come across the AT cannons. I like people to be correct.
    "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004

    To those in that club.

  10. #25
    Senior Member trackend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Canvey Island, Essex
    Posts
    4,040
    Country
    England
    Iv'e never seen a studded tank other than a lee grant.

  11. #26
    Senior Member plan_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    11,984
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Studded? You mean riveted? There were quite a few riveted tanks...
    "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004

    To those in that club.

  12. #27
    Senior Member trackend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Canvey Island, Essex
    Posts
    4,040
    Country
    England
    Steady on D you're starting to sound like an Anorak
    I was quipping

  13. #28
    Senior Member DaveB.inVa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    224
    Heres a Boys .55 caliber anti-tank rifle used in WWII. It wasn't really effective at all against German tanks but worked pretty well against Japanese tanks. It weighed 36lbs and fired a steel core armor piercing round at 3250 fps penetrating over 0.75" steel at over 300 yards.
    Attached Images

  14. #29
    Senior Member trackend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Canvey Island, Essex
    Posts
    4,040
    Country
    England
    I thought I would include the sticky bomb after all as it was ment for use against armour although all the ex squaddies i've spoken to who used them said that no one told them that they contained nitro if they had none of them would have been so enthusiastic in whacking them on the sides on their intended targets .
    Nº 74 ST Grenade
    (Sticky Grenade)

    Particulars:
    Weight: 2 lbs. 4 ozs.
    Fuze: Time
    Delay: 5 sec.

    The Nº 74 Grenade (Sticky Bomb) was designed as an anti-tank grenade and was disliked by everybody who ever came across it.

    The grenade consisted of a glass ball on the end of a bakelite (plastic) handle. Inside the glass ball was an explosive filling whilst on the outside was a very sticky adhesive covering. Until used, this adhesive covering was encased in a metal outer casing.

    Due to the use of glass in this grenade, they were fragile and travelled badly. Quite often the glass would crack in transit, causing the explosive to start leaking out. This explosive which leaked out was not very sensitive to friction but was very sensitive to impact and detonation could occur if the exposed explosive received a blow due to careless handling.

    To use the grenade, you remove the case release pin (not the pin marked 'DANGER'). This allows the metal protective casing to fall free, exposing the adhesive coating. You then grip the handle and safety lever and remove the safety pin (marked 'DANGER'). The grenade is now ready to either throw or attach to the target.

    This is where the sticky bomb is most dangerous! Whilst attempting to throw it, the grenade could stick to the wearers' clothing!

    If the thrower has not let go of the safety lever, he has to try and remove the item of clothing without letting go of the lever.
    If the thrower has let go of the lever, he has 5 second to remove the item of clothing and get a safe distance away from the bomb.
    When this happened, it tended to end up stuck to the throwers' trousers - with the uniform which was worn at the time, to remove his trousers (which were held up by braces) the thrower would have to remove any equipment (belt, ammunition pouches, etc.) followed by his Battle Dress blouse (jacket). He would then have to try and take his trousers off over his boots - all in less than 5 seconds!
    You may ask why the thrower could not just pull the grenade off of his clothing. They could try this but the adhesive coating was designed to allow the grenade, which weighed 2¼ lbs (1 Kg), to stick to the side of a tank.
    Attached Images

  15. #30
    Senior Member CharlesBronson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cordoba - Argentina
    Posts
    3,569
    Country
    Argentina
    Quote Originally Posted by Erich
    you guys know what this late war killer job is.... ?
    That is a Panzerfaust 150, very few were produced in the late war stages. Very efective and modern looking weapon.
    Last edited by CharlesBronson; 07-22-2008 at 10:18 PM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82