 |
11-21-2006, 05:57 PM
|
#271 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 120
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet Actually I think I just told you wrong what that was.
I think it is a Panzer 35(t)
Please someone correct me if I am wrong though I am not that up to date on the tank identification accept for the obvious tanks. | It is a LTH Czech tank. 24 were built in Switzerland under licence in 1939.
In Swiss service it was called Pz. 39.
The design finaly developed into the Czech LT-38 (38t in German service) http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/s...land/Praga.jpg Switzerland |
| |
11-22-2006, 12:39 PM
|
#272 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,270
Country: | Aha thankyou. I was looking at it again after I said it was Panzer III and I knew that it was not a Panzer III. I really dont know why I said it was that at first. Thanks anyhow on the proper identification.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
11-23-2006, 02:56 PM
|
#273 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 795
Country: | And a late model one at that - the early ones - up until Barbarossa - had a three part driver's/hull gunner's plate - only the later ones had a flat/straight one. That makes it an Ausf G if I remember rightly.
__________________ BATTLE OF FRANCE PROJECT for Combat Flight Simulator 3 |
| |
01-11-2007, 07:47 PM
|
#274 | | Member
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: London
Posts: 91
Country: | I chose Cromwell
No Tank expert but interested. My choice is influenced by something my Father thought. He served for 26 years in the 2nd Royal Tank Regiment, I'm bound to rely on him.
I wonder if the 'in the west' restriction here is to exclude the T34?
The best Tank isn't necessarily the right Tank.
A Tiger was a monster on the battle field of course, but also one to get there, I'll swear they would have done better to produce the many Panzer IV they would have got for their efforts instead of one Tiger.
Seawitch |
| |
01-12-2007, 03:50 PM
|
#275 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | i wouldn't count the T-35 as being in the west..........
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
01-17-2007, 06:47 PM
|
#276 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 580
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Hunter368 Last night I watched this program on the history channel above these guys in Califoria rebuilding a German Panther tank. It was very cool program. It talked about in detail all that was good and bad about the mechanics of a Panther tank. Very very interesting. They almost had to rebuild the whole tank from scratch, it had been damaged very badly. Great show.
You would of liked it. Here is a tiny bit of information on it.
History : On TV | Soren wouldn't, it explains how the Maybach was a crap engine.
To be fair, it did make one mistake: It blamed the Panthers unreliable gearbox on straight-cut gears, stating the helical-cut type of the Shermans as superior. Straight-cut gears are a hell of a lot stronger than helicals, as any engineer knows. I wonder what the engagement method was? It also has a Panther vs T34/845 suspension comparison, which is hilarious.
It downplays British innovations though, like regenerative steering and gun stabilization. |
| |
01-21-2007, 06:00 PM
|
#277 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 406
Country: | Wh
Last edited by bigZ : 01-21-2007 at 06:05 PM.
Reason: Sorry buggered up
|
| |
01-21-2007, 06:01 PM
|
#278 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 406
Country: | Valentine |
| |
02-09-2007, 12:02 PM
|
#279 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Limburg
Posts: 871
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by schwarzpanzer It downplays British innovations though, like regenerative steering and gun stabilization. | Which British tank used gun stabilization?
Kris
__________________ |
| |
02-13-2007, 06:22 PM
|
#280 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Montrose, Colorado
Posts: 2,283
Country: | Fine pictures of tanks. Is the one with 224 on the turret the Panther? |
| |
02-13-2007, 11:59 PM
|
#281 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 2,260
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by renrich Fine pictures of tanks. Is the one with 224 on the turret the Panther? |
I always thought the Panther was big like the Tiger, but I swear that looks like the High Velocity 75mm gun, so it must be the panther
__________________ Hello me...meet the real me.
And my misfits way of life.
A dark black past is my
Most valued possession.
Hindsight is always 20-20,
But looking back its still a bit fuzzy.
Speak of mutually assured destruction?
Nice story...tell it to readers digest!!! |
| |
02-14-2007, 05:35 AM
|
#282 | | World Traveler
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK
Posts: 11,751
Country: | Yeah it is a Panther but to me the wheelbase looks a bit short however the rest of it looks like a Panther which means it is (likely) one.
__________________ "Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill "To him the People of the World Largely owe the Freedom and Liberties they Enjoy Today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London Moderator WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum My Photo Collections on Flickr |
| |
02-14-2007, 07:58 AM
|
#283 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,027
| Don't tell me you guys actually doubt its a Pzkpfw. V ??!
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
02-14-2007, 09:16 AM
|
#284 | | World Traveler
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK
Posts: 11,751
Country: | I don't doubt it, it is a Panther but most of the pictures I have seen it has what appears to be a longer wheelbase than this one - probably just the angle of the photo though.
__________________ "Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill "To him the People of the World Largely owe the Freedom and Liberties they Enjoy Today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London Moderator WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum My Photo Collections on Flickr |
| |
02-14-2007, 09:45 AM
|
#285 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,270
Country: | Yes that is a Panther with the 224 on it. I took the picture a few months ago.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM. |  | |