WW2 GeneralDiscuss Best/Favourate Tank in the west in the World War II - General forums; please delete my account..
and you are more than welcome to delete all my posts..
thank you for your immediate ...
Whatever do as you please. I am not going to beg you to stay, there are plenty of people that wish to learn and teach there knowledge and debate in respectful ways. You can do so if you wish too, up to you. You can decide whether you want to be the weakest link or not...
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006
Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:
fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"
"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"
"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
Jackson, stop proving yourself wrong over and over again and start elaborating on your 90mm M1A1 armed Jumbo please.
And a little something to think about - I know Christian Ankerstjerne from the Axis History forum and he wouldn't agree with you either
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
I think you are the one that is out of your league. You are proving that with your post. And do me a favor please learn how to use a forum because you deleted posts are annoying.
Besides this is just getting stupid anyhow. You keep repeating the same stuff over and over that just proves you wrong.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006
Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:
fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"
"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"
"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
M3
An anti-tank version of the gun. It was used to equip the 90mm Gun Motor Carriage M36 and Heavy Tank M26 Pershing. It is also known as 90 mm L/50.
Neither of which where an M4 Sherman or a Sherman Jumbo. The M36 may of been built on a Sherman chassis but that doesn't make it a Sherman it is a totally different tank.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet
I think you are the one that is out of your league. You are proving that with your post. And do me a favor please learn how to use a forum because you deleted posts are annoying.
Besides this is just getting stupid anyhow. You keep repeating the same stuff over and over that just proves you wrong.
Agreed.
__________________
"Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill
"To him the People of the World Largely owe the Freedom and Liberties they Enjoy Today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London
Yeah, I am wrong, an over night field modification, retro fitting a new turret on an existing M4 body and chassis is a totally 'different " tank..
I will bet they might have even, spent half the night to grind out all the parts serial numbers and then repainted the whole thing top to bottom just so nobody knew its prior designation. So it was "totally differnt" they probably secretly changed the names of the crews overnight too, just to keep things straight.
OK, what ever...I am wrong..
You people with a 'superior knowledge' of all this could at least get the gun model and type correct. I mean you are telling Jackson about the "Jackson".
And my old 5.0 Mustang, I have bolted on a bunch of Saleen parts, I better buy some 'Saleen' name plates for it, becuse I changed the intake manifild and ported it, beefed up the suspension and otherwise 'bullet proofed' it.
I will be contacting the Department of Motor Vehicles here becuase I better change the registration certificate and title- right.
Yeah, I will just drop it.. You are obviously all experts on the M36B1. I picked my nick (Jackson) here by mistake, it should have been "M4A3/90 mm M3/ L50".
I gotta go for a ride out to "Bullrun", silly me, I call it Manassas.. (that is an a "Stonewall joke")
Everyone around the world hates people 'with a sense of humor' I can't get laid either.
My wife only married me because I can cook and my partners here at the firm would dump rat poison in my coffee except that I am the only one that really understands our tax software.
I don't know how I ever make any 'rain'.. I think it is only because my client base is mostly alcoholics. BTW, they are mostly ex military, defense contractors.. We all hang out at the Crystal City restaurant, in Pentagon City dreaming of hooking up with an 'adult entertainer" on crack.
Go right ahead. All we are saying the Jackson was not technically a Sherman. Based off of it, but not a Sherman.
If you had worded your words differently, people might have agreed with you. If you had not come off as such an ass at first calling people arrogant and then stupid. This might have goon more smoothly for you.
You will learn in time.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006
Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:
fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"
"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"
"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
Hey you're the one who brought up the "90mm M1A1" Jackson, not me...
Btw, the 90mm M3A1 and M1A1 are the same except one is for AA use and the other is modified to fit inside a tank..
And again, just to refresh your memory, its a M-36 and there was no Jumbo fitted with a 90mm gun during WW2.
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland