![]() |
| |||||||
| WW2 General Every WW2 related discussion besides aviation. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member | Carriers!! This is to continue the discussion on the carriers that we had in the Aircraft section. I hope we can keep this topic going, as it is a main force in Wold War two events. I hope this is not oversteping others who were going to start this topic. Plan_D, the British are not the sole developer for the flat top just as it is not only the RN atack on the Italians that helped The IJN plan it's attack t Pearl. Yamamoto was developing that before durring and affter and it helped to show a harbor could be hit as they planned. I am interested in the thought of them being used in WWI, I do not think ty would have been much help, but for convoys maybe
__________________ ![]() Seaplanes Are so nice |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member | There was little need for carriers in a convoy escort role during WW1. Airships could carry a greater load and remain on station longer. And as there was no air threat to convoys, fighter cover was irrelevant.
__________________ Good generals think about tactics. Great generals think about logistics. "If freedom is to be saved and enlarged, poverty must be ended. There is no other solution." - Nye Bevan "Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to ask for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee" - John Donne, Meditation XVII |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member | Besides the anti sub bombs then weren't really good enough
__________________ ![]() When you realise that the light at the end of the tunnel is actually an oncoming train, you know it's time to run for your life |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member | The British invented the AIRCRAFT CARRIER and the first purpose built AIRCRAFT CARRIER was the H.M.S Ark Royal. All those before it were either converted ships or LIGHT CARRIERS. On top of that, the British invented the angled-deck, steam-catapult, ski-jump and mirror sight. Yamamoto's chief of Staff was in Taranto at the time of the raid. You honestly think he didn't go tell Yamamoto how successful it was?!
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004 |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Canvey Island, Essex
Posts: 4,029
| Quote:
Development of the carrier was very much a international thing The US introduced the crash barrier and deck landing control officer (batsman) it also produce the most efficient recovery and launch systems indeed before the US had sent observer/officers to advise the British the normal interval between take offs was 30 seconds this fell too 10 seconds by adopting US methods. The US navy was far in advance of the British in there Officer training and recruitment of flyer's where as the British had gone about it piece meal in fact large numbers of trained pilots ended up transferring over to the RAF this left the Royal Navy with a big short fall in flyer's just before the start of hostilities.and senior ranks with flying Knowledge where virtually unknown on the other hand the USN had Admirals who had been flyer's this gave them a huge advantage in tactical awareness. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member | H.M.S Hermes had the armament of a Cruiser. It wasn't a sole Aircraft Carrier, it had extra armament. The H.M.S Ark Royal was the first purpose built Aircraft Carrier with no other intended role. I never stated the Pearl Harbour raid was a sole invention from their viewing of the Taranto raid. The raid had been war-gamed but it was the Taranto raid that proved to the Japanese that it would work.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004 |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Canvey Island, Essex
Posts: 4,029
| The Ark Royal completed 1938 had 16x 4.7inch 32x 2pdr Pom Poms the first Ark royal was a Seaplane carrier completed in 1914 The Hermes had 10x 6 inch & 4x4inch AA it was designed as the first purpose built flush deck carrier the weapon size was a reflection of the difference in time with the Idea of having some self defense against other surface ships more than against aircraft attack. With the Ark it was the other way round as carriers never sailed without escort protection against surface raiders. HMS Hermes is indeed recognised as the worlds first purpose built carrier. The USS Ranger 1934 was (I believe) the first American purpose built carrier. Im not 100% on this but I believe the Soryu 1937 was Japans first purpose built carrier. The Hosho 1922 although desribed as Japans first purpose built carrier was based on a fleet oiler hull. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member | The Ark Royal was the first purpose built Fleet Carrier then. You will notice with the H.M.S Hermes that is was not originally being built as an Aircraft Carrier, or at least the CRUISER hull wasn't. Also, the Hermes was designated a Fleet Carrier but as you well know, it wasn't built as one originally. Also, I would class the Hermes as a Light Carrier as it was remarkably small and light compared to modern Fleet Carriers of the late '30s.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004 |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Canvey Island, Essex
Posts: 4,029
| I disagree D the Hull of the Hermes was based on the design of a Cruiser hull as no one had come up with a specific carrier hull shape but when the keel was laid it was always intended to be a carrier and nothing but a carrier. It was not as you say D designated a fleet carrier as really this is a US term adopted later on. In the UK carriers where light or heavy the only different ones at the time of Hermes commisioning where the sea plane carriers and tenders. so using the US Carrier classification you are probably correct D. The Escort carrier was a WW2 hostilities only convoy protection vessel usually based on a suitable merchant vessel the UK aquired 43 of these vessels 37 coming from the US under lend lease and 6 converted in the Uk. The first UK built one was HMS Audacity which was a converted captured German merchantman it was sunk by torpedo in 1941. Nick names for the escort carriers where in the US Jeep carriers or Baby Flat tops and in the UK Woolworths carriers. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member | The Hermes was built to be able to act on it's own in a war situation. This was quickly realised as a flaw in an aircraft carrier design, the Ark Royal was designed from the start to be a part of a Fleet. The other surface vessels providing the guns for protection instead of the carrier itself. The fact that they didn't know what an Aircraft Carrier hull would look like doesn't take away the fact that it wasn't an Aircraft Carrier hull. The main thing is, also, the Hermes is a Light Carrier in comparison to the later Carriers. By 1937, when Ark Royal was laid down, the Hermes was Light. By modern standards the Ark Royal was the first modern carrier with minimal surface defence systems, and relying on other surface vessels in the fleet to provide protection.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004 |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Canvey Island, Essex
Posts: 4,029
| From the keel to the top of the Island Hermes was designed to be a carrier the hull shape does not detract from the fact that the Hermes was the first and smallest fleet carrier operated by the Royal Navy. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member | Eagle was, AFAIK,not a BC conversion. Glorious and Courageous were; they were completed as BCs and were derogatorily referred to as Spurious and Outrageous by the Fleet. Thier conversion to CVs was as much about strangling Fisher's dangerous battlecruiser dream as providing the fleet with air striking power. Eagle was built hull-up as a CV. Her tonnage is far too great to suggest she was designed as a CL or CA (even the late '20s Berwicks were only 8000 tons with a full complement of 8" guns), and far too small to suggest BC origins - HMS Renown weighed in at 36080 tons. Furthermore, it would not have made sense to convert a BC laid down in 1918 as a CV - it could either be completed as a BB or scrapped - a far more sensible option, which was the fate of a number of capital units under construction in 1918-19.
__________________ Good generals think about tactics. Great generals think about logistics. "If freedom is to be saved and enlarged, poverty must be ended. There is no other solution." - Nye Bevan "Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to ask for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee" - John Donne, Meditation XVII |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member | It wasn't a conversion, it had a Cruiser hull though. Yes, we'll just have to leave it here, Trackend.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004 |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Virginia
Posts: 490
| Quote:
__________________ hmmm ... I wonder what this switch does ... | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Canvey Island, Essex
Posts: 4,029
| I did think R (and Im sure you will be able to verifie or deny it) that the USS Ranger was the first US purpose built carrier of any size, as I believe all the ones previous to this where based on other vessels or hulls. Also have you any info on UK carrier categories as all mine say that HMS Hermes 10,750 tons was the first and smallest Fleet carrier operated by the RN where I believe in the US it has to be over 20,000 tons and carry over a set number of aircraft before it is rated as a fleet carrier. This appears to be quite a grey area especially prior too 1930. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |