ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

FG 42 in 7.92x33mm Kurz

WW2 General Discuss FG 42 in 7.92x33mm Kurz in the World War II - General forums; Sounds like a winning combination! But alas, 'twas not to be....

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    727
    Country
    United States

    FG 42 in 7.92x33mm Kurz

    Sounds like a winning combination!
    But alas, 'twas not to be.


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    515
    Country
    United States
    I don't know that it would be an improvement, you pick up 10 rounds in the magazine with the MP-44 but full auto was only supposed to be used in an emergency. The two rifles essentially weight the same and are nearly the same overall length, ( the FG-42 is only 5 mm longer) With the FG-42 I get a more straight line stock design to reduce muzzle climb, a built in bipod to aid in accurate prone fire, I can use the same round as the other riflemen and the squad machine gun and I get 150 meters more effective range with a higher rate of full auto and built in scope mounts. for my two cents I'd just as soon have the FG-42 if they were my only two choices

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,312
    Country
    United States
    I think the idea of the FG 42 was to replace the Mauser 98 rifle, the MP 40 submachine gun AND the MG 34 with one gun.

    Changing the gun to use 7.92X33 ammo cuts the range to the point that the MG 34 (or mg 42) is still needed for long range firepower.

  4. #4
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,223
    Country
    United States
    Changing the gun to use 7.92X33 ammo cuts the range to the point that the MG 34 (or mg 42) is still needed for long range firepower.
    I suspect that's what the German Army concluded.

    RPK - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    However the Soviet Union thought differently. The RPK was a lot like the weapon being proposed here.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,312
    Country
    United States
    Russians still issued 7.63x54 PK machine guns at company level or lower.
    Even during the 50s they had DPs, DPMs and belt fed RP-46s to supplement the 7.62x39 RPDs.

    Maybe the Germans did screw up in "the best is the enemy of better".
    While an 7.92X33 FG-42 would have replaced at least some of the MG 34/42s in a parachute company/battalion it couldn't replace all of them. I am talking about just the bipod versions here.
    Since a 7.92X33 couldn't meet the requirement it might have been a no go.

  6. #6
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,223
    Country
    United States

    Puma IFV

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puma_(IFV)
    On a related note, the new German Puma IFV uses a 5.56mm HK MG4 for the coaxial machinegun. I find it surprising they would mount such a small machinegun on an armored vehicle. 5.56mm NATO has roughly the same knock down power as the 7.92mm kurz and Soviet 7.62mm x 39 (i.e. RPK) round.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91