Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

FG-42 & StG.44 vids

WW2 General Discuss FG-42 & StG.44 vids in the World War II - General forums; FG-42 Version 1: YouTube - Fg 42 primo tipo YouTube - FG 42 in Action FG-42 Version 2: YouTube - Fg ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - General > WW2 General

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-20-2008, 09:27 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,763
FG-42 & StG.44 vids

FG-42 Version 1:
YouTube - Fg 42 primo tipo
YouTube - FG 42 in Action

FG-42 Version 2:
YouTube - Fg 42 secondo tipo
YouTube - Fg-42 Fallschirmjägergewehr
YouTube - fg42 at kcr april 2006

StG.44:
YouTube - StG 44 assault rifle part 4/5
YouTube - StG 44 assault rifle part 5/5
YouTube - MP44

Enjoy!
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 09:43 PM   #2
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,431
Country:
Fg-42 is a beautiful weapon. But not a shoulder weapon.

And StG is a heavy weapon. Perhaps not for its time, but heavy nonetheless. However, I would take one over a Thompson.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 12:46 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
SoD Stitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 751
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt308 View Post
Fg-42 is a beautiful weapon. But not a shoulder weapon.

And StG is a heavy weapon. Perhaps not for its time, but heavy nonetheless. However, I would take one over a Thompson.
Me, too; the world's first true "assault rifle". I understand you can actually still buy replicas of the StG 44; I would love to have one! Although the "oddball" 7.92mm ammo might be hard to come by; everything else has gone to 7.62 mm (including the "modern-day" MG 42, the MG 3).
__________________
SoD Stitch is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 06:49 AM   #4
Minister of Whoopass
 
lesofprimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 13,169
Country:
Not a shoulder weapon??? The FG 42????

Comeon...... Ive fired it before, from the shoulder, quite similar to this guy....
YouTube - Fg-42 Fallschirmjägergewehr
__________________


"Boyington was a Drunk, but He was a Drunk We'd Follow Straight Into Hell..."
--Lt. William Northrop Case
lesofprimus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 08:57 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,763
The FG-42 is very much a shoulder weapon, infact its one of the most comfortable and easy to wield full power automatic rifles.

The straight inline stock & muzzle brake really helps allot to lessen recoil and muzzle rise. For this reason the straight inline stock has also become a standard in assault rifles, as-well as the muzzle brake.

The M-14 is for comparison a beast to try and control in automatic fire, suffering from allot of muzzle rise.

Also owing to its design the FG-42 is allot more comfortable to wield than most weapons, most who have fired both versions of the FG-42 note how it just fits like a glove.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland

Last edited by Soren : 02-23-2008 at 09:03 AM.
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 09:15 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Konigstiger205's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bucharest
Posts: 825
Country:
Interesting weapons...love the Mp44...indeed heavy but then again it was the worlds first assault rifle and when you do something the world has never seen before there has to be a problem or two...
__________________
These airplanes we have today are no more than a perfection of a child's toy made of paper."Henri Coanda"
Konigstiger205 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 05:27 PM   #7
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,431
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by lesofprimus View Post
Not a shoulder weapon??? The FG 42????

Comeon...... Ive fired it before, from the shoulder, quite similar to this guy....
YouTube - Fg-42 Fallschirmjägergewehr
Sorry Les. Disagree. Too high a rate of fire for 8mm Mauser on full auto. It would take a disciplined SEAL to prevent it from walking up...

Oh nevermind.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 05:31 PM   #8
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,431
Country:
Look gents, you look at that guy in Les' video and he is about a 100MOA shooter for a 4rnd burst. Been there done that.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts

Last edited by Matt308 : 02-23-2008 at 05:35 PM.
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 06:55 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,763
Matt,

The FG-42 is a selective fire weapon, and thus can be sired at either semi or fully automatic. The great thing about the FG-42 though is that when firing at semi automatic it does so from a closed bolt, making it extremely accurate. Furthermore when it fires at fully automatic it does so from an open bolt, preventing cook offs. And on top of this the inline stock and muzzle brake make recoil & muzzle rise very mild in comparison to e.g. the M-14 or BAR. So the FG-42 is very much a shoulder weapon.

In the FG-42 you've got a 4.5 kg LMG, automatic rifle & sniper rifle all in one, with bipod, scope, bayonet and the lot...

Hence why the FG-42 is such a fantastic smallarm, the swiss-army knife of infantry rifles

You just can't help but love it!
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 11:22 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,819
I haven't shot anything automatic from my shoulder so you may want to discount this statement but I have done a lot of target shooting.
If that video is considered accurate then I am a chinaman, its waving around like a fiddlers elbow.
Glider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 05:14 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,763
Automatic fire is never accurate from the shoulder.

Take a look at the other vids I linked. Controlled bursts is the way.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 08:23 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,819
They were controlled bursts as far as I could tell and to be honest they seem to have to clear the gun a number of times.
As I said I haven't fired anything automatic of that type. I would appreciate some guidance with people with experience in these weapons.
Glider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 08:36 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,763
That the Italian guy had to clear the gun a number of times can be attributed to a number of things, improper cleaning & maintenance of the gun (Using too much or too little lubricant, using too much oil will make a gun jam constantly), ammunition type used etc etc... But one also has to keep in mind that these guns are over 60 years old & well used.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland

Last edited by Soren : 02-24-2008 at 08:42 AM.
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 08:56 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,763
Looking at the vids again the guy only had to clear the gun once in all of the vids, the stovepipe occuring with the second version with the 40 round mag. The mag is unoriginal according to the guy so that is probably the reason behind the stovepipe.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland

Last edited by Soren : 02-24-2008 at 08:58 AM.
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 12:50 PM   #15
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,431
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glider View Post
I haven't shot anything automatic from my shoulder so you may want to discount this statement but I have done a lot of target shooting.
If that video is considered accurate then I am a chinaman, its waving around like a fiddlers elbow.
Thankyou.

You would have to measure that in minute-of-barn. And lets be honest, semi-auto from the shoulder was not its forte'.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92