Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Flags of our Fathers... Fiction?

WW2 General Discuss Flags of our Fathers... Fiction? in the World War II - General forums; Flags of Our Fathers has Fantastic audio... you must watch it on a good TV with a solid surround sound ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - General > WW2 General

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-28-2007, 02:11 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
comiso90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,265
Country:
Flags of our Fathers... Fiction?

Flags of Our Fathers has Fantastic audio... you must watch it on a good TV with a solid surround sound system. You have to turn up SFX of the Corsairs so that your domicile rattles and the neighbors whine.

One scene I wasn’t to sure about was how close some large naval vessels were to the beach. It appeared that Battleships were within 1000 yards of the beach and taking a pounding from Japanese shore batteries.

Did they really take the big ships in that close? I know destroyers often scrapped bottom to provide support but I'd be surprised to learn that Cruisers and Battleships got in so close. I suppose that it would allow them to use AA guns offensively but damn..

Does the ammo on Naval gun need time/distance to arm?
__________________
“that can’t be a prop job....it’s got to be one of the 262 jets.”.... James Finnegan.



comiso90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2007, 04:23 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Phila, Pa
Posts: 2,375
Country:
It sounds like it was done for dramatic affect. One of the problems with the early invasions was the battleships being too close. The further out the ship fired, the better the penetration due to "plunging fire". At least that is how I understood it. The naval gunfire at Tarawa was ineffective because the ships were too close (and the bombardment was not long enough).

There are others on this board (Delcrois being one) who know more about it than I. Maybe they'll chime in.
timshatz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2007, 10:12 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Thorlifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 2,366
Country:
You know, I thought the same thing. As soon as I saw that battleship get hit, I told my wife, "Bull S**T, there is no way they would get there battleships in that close."

Or am I wrong?
Thorlifter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2007, 10:19 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
comiso90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,265
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorlifter View Post
You know, I thought the same thing. As soon as I saw that battleship get hit, I told my wife, "Bull S**T, there is no way they would get there battleships in that close."

Or am I wrong?
It is totally unimaginable. The only feasible reason would be so they can use the 40 mm's. Not to mention the difficulty they would have tryin to maneuver the things if there was an air attack.

Why does Hollywood fail to see that the real - life facts are often dramatic enough?
__________________
“that can’t be a prop job....it’s got to be one of the 262 jets.”.... James Finnegan.



comiso90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 02:09 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Emac44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brisbane Queensland
Posts: 1,549
Country:
Send a message via Yahoo to Emac44
I would say it was done for dramatic effect only for the movie. Reality would be far different
Emac44 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 06:36 AM   #6
Minister of Whoopass
 
lesofprimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 12,952
Country:
Its made up for the movie... Heres a pic of the first wave with Surabachi in the back... Dont seem very close do they???

__________________


"Boyington was a Drunk, but He was a Drunk We'd Follow Straight Into Hell..."
--Lt. William Northrop Case
lesofprimus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 07:30 AM   #7
"Shooter"
 
evangilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 12,532
Country:
Send a message via Yahoo to evangilder
I do seem to remember reading an account where the Marines were taking a hell of a beating at one point and a ship came in to assist because they were getting hit so bad. I do't recall what kind of ship it was. I will have to dig into it. It does sound familiar.
__________________


http://www.vg-photo.com

Wherever their bones may lie, the courage of heroes is consecrated in the hearts and engraved in the history of the free. Lt Col Honner DSO MC, 39th Commander speaking of the dead from the battle of Kokoda.
evangilder is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 07:39 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Gnomey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK
Posts: 11,223
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Gnomey Send a message via MSN to Gnomey
Quote:
Originally Posted by evangilder View Post
I do seem to remember reading an account where the Marines were taking a hell of a beating at one point and a ship came in to assist because they were getting hit so bad. I do't recall what kind of ship it was. I will have to dig into it. It does sound familiar.
Yeah, I know on Omaha Beach the destroyers were coming to with 500 yards of the beach to shell hidden German Machine guns, so it would not surprise me if there were ships in that close. However I don't believe that Battleships would be in that close (would depend on the shelving of the beach to an extent) and would prefer to stay further of shore to gain the plunging effect of their shells.
__________________


"Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill

"To him the people of the world largely owe the Freedom and liberties they enjoy today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London


Moderator WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum
Gnomey is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 11:18 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Phila, Pa
Posts: 2,375
Country:
There was a ship (small one) called an LCI (G). It stood for Landing Craft Infantry (Gunboat). The job of these boats/ships was to go in with the infantry for close support. They were something like 160ft long and loaded with light (up to 75MM/3") guns. Most likely, that is what they sent in to support the Marines when they needed it. Designed to be very shallow drafted.

As for a BB getting hit by shore guns, good luck to the shore guns. Those things (BBs) had upwards of a foot of hardened armor on them (sides) and about 4-6" on the deck. Most of the shore guns on these islands came in at 8" and below. Most likely just bounce off the side of the BB and generally get the crew worked up about the gun.
timshatz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 11:27 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
comiso90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,265
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by timshatz View Post

As for a BB getting hit by shore guns, good luck to the shore guns. Those things (BBs) had upwards of a foot of hardened armor on them (sides) and about 4-6" on the deck. Most of the shore guns on these islands came in at 8" and below. Most likely just bounce off the side of the BB and generally get the crew worked up about the gun.
Thanks for the info..

In the movie, the shore gun was high enough on Suribachi and the BB was close enough that the shell shot straight down onto the deck and erupted into a conflagration.

I hate Hollywood
__________________
“that can’t be a prop job....it’s got to be one of the 262 jets.”.... James Finnegan.



comiso90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 12:34 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,158
Country:
I did find this on the internet.

"CLOSING IN: Marines in the Seizure of Iwo Jima
by Colonel Joseph H. Alexander
U.S. Marine Corps (Ret)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D-Day

Weather conditions around Iwo Jima on D-day morning, 19 February 1945, were almost ideal. At 0645 Admiral Turner signalled "Land the landing force!"

Shore bombardment ships did not hesitate to engage the enemy island at near point-blank range. Battleships and cruisers steamed as close as 2,000 yards to level their guns against island targets. Many of the "Old Battleships" had performed this dangerous mission in all theaters of the war. Marines came to recognize and appreciate their contributions. It seemed fitting that the old Nevada, raised from the muck and ruin of Pearl Harbor, should lead the bombardment force close ashore. Marines also admired the battleship Arkansas, built in 1912, and recently returned from the Atlantic where she had battered German positions at Point du Hoc at Normandy during the epic Allied landing on 6 June 1944."

2000 yards is close, just over a mile.

I have not found any reference to damage to the Nevada or Arkansas.

Last edited by davparlr : 03-01-2007 at 12:37 PM. Reason: added info
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 02:51 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
comiso90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,265
Country:
Thats intersting Dav. I'll try to post a frame of the movie tonight.
__________________
“that can’t be a prop job....it’s got to be one of the 262 jets.”.... James Finnegan.



comiso90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 04:07 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Phila, Pa
Posts: 2,375
Country:
I had heard about the Arkansas duking it out with shore guns near Point Du Hoc. Either the New York or the Texas was with her. Think it was the New York. They got in a shooting match with some German 9"-12" guns located inland. I believe there was an old British BB with them as well.

Did not know about BBs getting close at Iwo. Could have happened. But it doesn't make much sense, given the guns they carried and gunnery methods. DDs? Yes. CLs? Maybe. CCs? Less so. BBs? What's the point?
timshatz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 10:44 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
comiso90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,265
Country:
It looks a lot different on still frame. The scale is off but the second photo looks ike an Iowa class.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg BB1.jpg (47.1 KB, 36 views)
File Type: jpg BB2.jpg (40.5 KB, 36 views)
__________________
“that can’t be a prop job....it’s got to be one of the 262 jets.”.... James Finnegan.



comiso90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 11:18 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Phila, Pa
Posts: 2,375
Country:
That is way too close for a Battlewagon. If nothing else it would screw up the traffic patterns close to the beach and blow the eardrums of everyone in the little boats every time they opened up. That pic is way too crowded and close.

There was a class of Battle Cruiser that the US produced during the war. It was the Alaska Class (again, going on memory). Looked the same as the BBs but was smaller. Had 11" guns. I think they only made two of them and scrapped the other two. Were only in action for about a year to a year and a half.

If the movie were accurate (and I doubt it is- Hollywood, sheesh!), it could be one of them. But again, I doubt it.

As always, IMHO.
timshatz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86