 | German commando attack on the US, Canada & Alaska| WW2 General Discuss German commando attack on the US, Canada & Alaska in the World War II - General forums; Originally Posted by Soren
Glider, you're wrong on many of your points:
1.) The Enigma wasn't completely broken ... |
|
05-29-2008, 08:55 AM
|
#46 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,887
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren Glider, you're wrong on many of your points:
1.) The Enigma wasn't completely broken in 42 & 43, infact there was a period were it was fully kryptic.
2.) The men could easily be transported by U-boat, the Germans set off spies in the US quite a few times, not to mention a multitude of weatherstations etc etc. And a Type IXD could carry tons of equipment and men, easily carrying about 25 men beyond the crew
3.) When they arrive they can commandeer a vehicle if needed.
4.) Civilian clothes is brought along to give the ability to blend in when needed.
5.) Spies could be set off long BEFORE the raid, gathering information beneficial to the succes of the raid.
__________________________________________ | 1) It was however broken to a degree and even if not cracked plots were often made and an indication of the tracks made.
2) Taking your examples, spies were in groups of 4 no more, The multitude of weather stations were not that numerous and I note with interest it took 48 hours to unload the U Boat at anchor and of course they didn't didn't weigh a huge amount. As for carrying 25 men over and above the crew, it never happened and I doubt that it could.
3) 'Obtaining a Lorry' how many men are we talking about, how many trucks and no one will notice!!
4) Civilian clothes, so we are talking spies and no one will notice men carrying packs talking with a foriegn accent, lord knows how many miles in land.
5) Spies, Germany didn't have any of any note in the USA and once war was declared they were rounded up. For instance, the only country Germany had a decent spy network in the Americas was in Brazil not exactly convenient for the USA. In case your interested, eight weeks after Germany declared war on the USA Brazil severed relations with Germany and eight weeks after that all their spies in Brazil had been rounded up. Some of these fled to Chile and Argentina but these were soon captured as the USA kept tabs on them and leant on the authorities. |
| |
05-29-2008, 10:16 AM
|
#47 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 7,210
Country: | Freebird, I'll take a stab at it.
U-boats did make it off the coast of New Jersey rather close so some type of froggy commando attack could have been made up the Delaware to the Philadelphia and Camden boat yards. Now I have no idea about the defenses or how shallow the Delaware is but maybe we could start there. Those two yards were very active during the war. And as they sit half-way between DC and NY, I'm sure some type of over reactive panic would ensue.
As an added bonus, there was a German POW camp in the southern portion of the state, I believe around Vineland and the first USAAF airfield built during the war that trained pilots on the P-47 was at Millville. So a coordinated attack against ship yards and airfield along with letting loose some prisoners. Oh I feel like Ian Flemming!
__________________ 
"If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!"
Last edited by Njaco : 05-29-2008 at 01:41 PM.
|
| |
05-29-2008, 10:32 AM
|
#48 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 860
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by syscom3 I went to visit that camp last summer. Its now a national monument due to the historical significance of it.
Best way to call it is a "detention camp". |
Agreed. It was late last night after a crappy day at work. That's all my poor, overworked braincell could supply at the time. *g* Yep. Detention camp, or internment camp. Most assuredly, no matter what its called, they were NOT one of the USofA's most shining moments.
__________________ Pillage, then burn.
Argue not with dragons, for thou art crunchy and go well on toast. |
| |
05-29-2008, 10:41 AM
|
#49 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 860
Country: | Hmmmm...not sure how most of those POW's would react to being "freed". Consider that they were usually being worked in the fields around the camps, being paid, being fed three squares a day. They had access to privileges even few of the upper-eschelon in Berlin had access to. Early in the war, when the outcome was still up for grabs, sure, the majority of them would probably have raised a ruckus, then gotten shot as an escapee or been re-captured. Late '43, and definitely from mid-'44 on, most of the Axis soliders who could think knew there was very little hope of winning, and only fought on because the Fatherland was threatened....and the SS was standing about fifteen yards behind them. So, once again, depending on when said raid would take place, there probably wouldn't be much support from the POW camps. A few die-hards, yes. But didn't a good percentage of the POW's interred in the US and Canada apply to stay when the war was over, instead of being repatriated to a devestated country?
__________________ Pillage, then burn.
Argue not with dragons, for thou art crunchy and go well on toast. |
| |
05-29-2008, 02:28 PM
|
#50 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,051
| It would take place in early to mid 1942 Rabid.
Now contrary to what Glider believes a Uboat could carry many men besides the dedicated crew, a Type IX could easily haul along 25 extra men, and even more if the number of torpedoes carried were cut down. On top of that the Type IX had a cargo hold on the top deck, usually used for extra torps or mail, food (Incase of milkcow), equipment, looted goods etc etc. This cargo hold could ofcourse therefore be used to hold all the equipment needed for the raid.
Oh and I don't know where Glider got the idea from that it took 25 men 48 hours to get out of the sub, into rubber boat and head for shore - guess they must have been really sloooow according to Glider.
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
05-29-2008, 03:15 PM
|
#51 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 7,210
Country: | Does anyone know what the closest a U-boat has come to the US shoreline?
__________________ 
"If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!" |
| |
05-29-2008, 03:23 PM
|
#52 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,293
Country: | I believe there were U-Boots within site of New York City. They surfaced just outside of the harbor and they could see the lights of the city.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
05-29-2008, 05:37 PM
|
#53 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Phila, Pa
Posts: 2,646
Country: | Njaco, the Delaware is pretty shallow for the most part. About 40 foot in the channel with plenty of shoals. Be impossible to run a sub up there underwater. On top of the hazards to navigation, there would be a ton of traffic (especially during war time). Somebody would run it over.
I think a sub managed to lay some mines in the mouth of the Ches in early 42. Same thing for the sea lanes into NYC. One also got into the St. Lawrence Seaway in 42. There were also a bunch of them shooting up tanker traffic off Diamond Shoals down off Cape Hatterus (sp?). Also, close enough to see the lights on the following cities:
Miami
Jacksonville (made a landing there with spies)
Charleston
Wilmington NC
Atlantic City
N. Jersey
NYC
Those are the ones I know of. Seems there was a big problem with the local mayors not wanting to black out their cities because of worries over the tourist trade. Finally, after losing 400 ships in 6 months, it became manditory.
Here's a link to the wiki on it: Second Happy Time - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Decent book on the whole thing is "Operation Drumbeat". Rough english translation for the German Sub attacks on the East Coast. Link to book on Amazon. Ok book. Read it a while ago. Operation Drumbeat, Germany's U-Boat Attacks Along the American Coast in World War II - Yahoo! Shopping |
| |
05-29-2008, 06:21 PM
|
#54 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,887
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren It would take place in early to mid 1942 Rabid.
Now contrary to what Glider believes a Uboat could carry many men besides the dedicated crew, a Type IX could easily haul along 25 extra men, and even more if the number of torpedoes carried were cut down. On top of that the Type IX had a cargo hold on the top deck, usually used for extra torps or mail, food (Incase of milkcow), equipment, looted goods etc etc. This cargo hold could ofcourse therefore be used to hold all the equipment needed for the raid.
Oh and I don't know where Glider got the idea from that it took 25 men 48 hours to get out of the sub, into rubber boat and head for shore - guess they must have been really sloooow according to Glider. | Soren
The 48 hours to unload the U Boat for the weather station came from your posting I quote On October 22 U-537 arrived at Martin Bay at the northern tip of Labrador. For the next 48 hours U-537 lay at anchor while the crew manhandled the 220-pound canisters, along with a tripod and mast, into rubber boats and then onshore.
Re the carrying of 25 extra people in a Type IX I don't believe it. I haven't been in a Type IX but I have been in an Oberon Class submarine which is of a similar size and the idea is just not on.
The only submarines that I know that carried raiding parties were three American submarines that weighed an extra 1000 tons and were originally designed as minelayers. The minespaces were free to be used as troop carriers.
Last edited by Glider : 05-29-2008 at 06:36 PM.
|
| |
05-29-2008, 06:36 PM
|
#55 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Prescott Arizona USA
Posts: 496
| On U-boats getting places... I could be wrong on the river or the whole info..But "I was thinking" that a U-boat got up the Saint Lawrence river and wreaked its ruder ..And its some were in a museum up in that part of the world ... Flame me and shoot me down if I'm keeping rumors going ... Ring a bell ...??
I'm sure with the nuts of the U-boat captains they were sniffing around the US coast line more then we knew... |
| |
05-29-2008, 07:13 PM
|
#56 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: NIAGARA
Posts: 4,828
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Haztoys On U-boats getting places... I could be wrong on the river or the whole info..But "I was thinking" that a U-boat got up the Saint Lawrence river and wreaked its ruder ..And its some were in a museum up in that part of the world ... Flame me and shoot me down if I'm keeping rumors going ... Ring a bell ...??
I'm sure with the nuts of the U-boat captains they were sniffing around the US coast line more then we knew... | There actually was a a battle up here its called the Battle of the St Lawrence there was a number of U boat patrols in the St Lawrence one almost got to Quebec City
this link will explain it better then I but 42 attacks were made 22 ships were sunk including 3 naval vessels The Battle of the Gulf of St. Lawrence - Veterans Affairs Canada
__________________ |
| |
05-29-2008, 07:34 PM
|
#57 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,484
| Soren, the commando's will only be able to haul a couple of hundred pounds of explosive at any given time.
Just exactly what can they do to materially effect the war?
Blow up a dam? Nope.
Bring down a bridge? Possibly. But how will that effect production?
Take out a power plant? No.
Take out transmission lines? Yes, but for how long?
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
05-29-2008, 07:59 PM
|
#58 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: NIAGARA
Posts: 4,828
Country: | [quote=syscom3;359382]Soren, the commando's will only be able to haul a couple of hundred pounds of explosive at any given time.
Take out a power plant? No.
QUOTE]I would think you could take out a power plant at least here you could if you knew the infrastructure and the locks on the Mississippi or the what is now called the St Lawrence Seaway. They were guarded 24/7 . certain bridges could cause havoc and the same places were also guarded after 9/11
__________________ |
| |
05-29-2008, 08:16 PM
|
#59 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,484
| But theres the issue of damage vs destruction. The amount of explosives the commando's could use was always limited.
Also, if something critical was wrecked, the US and Canadians would repair it so fast, the interruption in production wouldn't be noticed.
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
05-29-2008, 08:41 PM
|
#60 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: NIAGARA
Posts: 4,828
Country: | In the 1940's if you knocked the out the hydro electric power (possibly largest in the world)plants you'd have no abrasives i believe this area was the hub for abrasives . No abrasives no machining
__________________ |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 PM. |  | |