German commando attack on the US, Canada & Alaska - Aircraft of World War II

Soren · 05-26-2008, 12:24 PM

German commando attack on the US, Canada & possibly Alaska

The time is early 1942 and Amerika recently entered the war, and so to sabotage its war effort by striking fear into the hearts of the civilian population Germany is planning a commando raid on the US & Canada and perhaps even a small town in Alaska just to demonstrate their abilities.

A further purpose of the mission is to be putting up weather stations and radio transmitters, allowing Germany to monitor in some degree what's going on in the country.

Question is how would they do it? How effective would it be ? How long would it last ? Do the commandos get extracted or escape the countries somehow after their attack, or do they fight to the death, or perhaps even let themselves capture ? Also what equipment would be needed, and what would be the most effective ?

Looking forward to hear your thoughts.

FLYBOYJ · 05-26-2008, 12:29 PM

Well it was tried on a very low scale and it didn't work too well...

America in WWII magazine: Nazi spies, Erich Gimpel, William Colepaugh, Maine, Boston, New York, FBI

Attacks on North America during World War II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Soren · 05-26-2008, 01:19 PM

Hehe FLYBOYJ, those were spy operations, which is completely different from a commando attack.

comiso90 · 05-26-2008, 01:24 PM

If they played by the rules of today, one of the most effective things they could do would be blowing up a highschool football game in the heartland or planting land mines on the beach for sun bathers to find... Loading a suitcase full of explosives into a Yellow Cab in Times Square...

Not playing by the rules of war? Was blindly launching V-1's into London or the firebombing of cites any more civil?

IMO, German agents could only effect the war in a couple of ways:
Passive observation and intelligence gathering
Attacks against soft, low value targets to spread terror an hysteria
Attacks against lightly protected, unprotected civilian infrastructure.. telephone lines, power stations, starting fires

Attacking / sabotaging military targets is romantic but not practical.

Soren · 05-26-2008, 01:26 PM

Very interesting links nonetheless FLYBOYJ, thanks.

Haztoys · 05-26-2008, 02:06 PM

If I were running the the Axis..I would of done more moves like you have said here Sorens .... Not that it would of helped militarily per say as to win land or said battle...But as in the Dambusters move ...The wreaked dams did not stop the Germans factory's.. But it did tied up men and machines that should and could of been used else were... Workers had to fix the dam ..The workers were pulled from the Atlantic Wall to fix the dam ...And the Germans moved troops to defend the dams...That could of been at D-day and the Eastern Front...

syscom3 · 05-26-2008, 02:55 PM

The US industrial machine was so vast, theres nothing the commando team could have done to materially effect the war.

Soren · 05-26-2008, 03:01 PM

What about blowing up the hoover dam ?

Haztoys · 05-26-2008, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soren

What about blowing up the hoover dam ?

You ever been to Hoover dam Sorens...?.. Its way in land... and not much down stream to hurt the war machine...And it would have to be a hell of alot of commandos to pull it off ..Packing a lot of explosives... Was just over it two weeks ago ...The wrecked German dams were real long ... Hoover is short and in a very deep canyon...

Not that it could not be done...

I would think a move near the coast would be a better move ... If your picturing a Dambusters move like the Brit's did "I" would not think it could be done... A Lanc at 60 feet would lose it wings as narrow as the canyon is..We in America do dams in deep canyon ..At list out west we do..Not wide places as they do over in Europe

But I do think Cmmando raids would of tied up alot of the war machine..America had a bigger war machine ...Harder to hurt then the Germans Machine...

Soren · 05-26-2008, 03:33 PM

Hehe, no no, I'm not talking about another dambuster raid. But I do believe that exploding the dam was possible, but it would be a very tough task and a commando team wouldn't be capable of it.

pbfoot · 05-26-2008, 03:51 PM

according to what I've heard Goebbels threatened my neck of the woods with its hydro electric capacity and the chemical and abrasives industries whether this folk lore or not I don't know.

syscom3 · 05-26-2008, 04:03 PM

Hoover dam has survived a mag 5 quake. No amount of explosives is going to take this one out.

Damaging the power generators or transmission towers would be a good bet. But its not the only power source for California.

DerAdlerIstGelandet · 05-26-2008, 04:11 PM

In the end I do not think it would have accomplished anything.

Blowing up the Hoover Damn would hurt a small portion of America. The US's resources were spread out all over the United States.

A "terrorist" attack would have put fear into the people, but in the end it would have only rallied the US people even more and given them more resolve to end the war and more than likely "punish" Germany on an even greater scale.

RabidAlien · 05-26-2008, 07:08 PM

I don't think a commando attack on the US, anywhere, would've done Germany any good. Keep in mind that the country was really unified after Pearl Harbor. Even the Isolationists were all for attacking and gettin some back. A commando attack would not have done any good....raids that small, in a country that has no "front line borders" anywhere near it, would not have diverted any significant amount of troops from critical front line positions. Raids that small, in a country with such a huge industrial capability, would not have slowed production or distribution of war materiel in any insignificant way. The Japanese managed to surface a submarine and fire a few shells on the west coast, damaging (I believe) an un-occupied carnival or something like it...no military benefits whatsoever. All they managed to do was to get the civilians to organize themselves into a sort of neighborhood-watch....not the military, but the civilians. So, unless the commando raid happened to take out pretty much every military and civilian leader at once, it would've done nothing more than really piss off the populace and get a group of skilled military men killed/captured for no reason whatsoever. Also keep in mind that, to pull it off successfully, they would've had to come in in Allied uniforms/clothes, not German uniforms. Therefore, if caught, they would be treated as spies and subject to execution according to the Geneva Convention.

If they had tried it, I believe the best thing they could've done would be to land small groups to, as stated earlier, mine beaches and coastal waterways and roadways. Yes, they would've eventually been caught, but nighttime commando raids would've had a slightly longer longevity than one or two "terroristic" strikes. The submarines, while waiting for the commandos to perform their missions, could surface and fire off a few deck-gun rounds at targets of opportunity, such as wealthy mansions (nuttin like a couple of pissed off rich folks to put pressure on the military to divert a trainload of troops or two!) or factories. America and Canada, however, have the rather unique advantage of not sharing common borders with a bunch of different, potentially beligerent, nations. Anything out to get us would have to cross alot of water. So all of our output can be channeled into the offensive, instead of split between offense and defense.

My head hurts now from all this thinking...if such it can be called. *g*

ETA: Erich Gimpel wrote a book about his experience as a spy. I used to own the book, but can't find it...probably got stuck in the wrong pile and went to Half-Price Books at some point. Here's the Amazon.com link: Amazon.com: Agent 146: The True Story of a Nazi Spy in America: Erich Gimpel: Books

Soren · 05-26-2008, 07:42 PM

The thing I find confusing here is that some seem to suggest that the US wasn't already doing all it could when it hadn't suffered commando raid. In my mind that makes no sense at all.

The US industry was running as fast as it could right after Pearl Harbour, so a Commando could only hamper that to some degree, it certainly wouldn't strenghten it.

05-26-2008, 12:24 PM	#1
Soren Banned Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 6,625	German commando attack on the US, Canada & Alaska German commando attack on the US, Canada & possibly Alaska The time is early 1942 and Amerika recently entered the war, and so to sabotage its war effort by striking fear into the hearts of the civilian population Germany is planning a commando raid on the US & Canada and perhaps even a small town in Alaska just to demonstrate their abilities. A further purpose of the mission is to be putting up weather stations and radio transmitters, allowing Germany to monitor in some degree what's going on in the country. Question is how would they do it? How effective would it be ? How long would it last ? Do the commandos get extracted or escape the countries somehow after their attack, or do they fight to the death, or perhaps even let themselves capture ? Also what equipment would be needed, and what would be the most effective ? Looking forward to hear your thoughts. Last edited by Soren; 05-26-2008 at 12:27 PM.

05-26-2008, 12:29 PM	#2
FLYBOYJ IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA Posts: 16,881	Well it was tried on a very low scale and it didn't work too well... America in WWII magazine: Nazi spies, Erich Gimpel, William Colepaugh, Maine, Boston, New York, FBI Attacks on North America during World War II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia __________________ > I Support Doug Gillis <

05-26-2008, 01:24 PM	#4
comiso90 Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: FL Posts: 3,529	If they played by the rules of today, one of the most effective things they could do would be blowing up a highschool football game in the heartland or planting land mines on the beach for sun bathers to find... Loading a suitcase full of explosives into a Yellow Cab in Times Square... Not playing by the rules of war? Was blindly launching V-1's into London or the firebombing of cites any more civil? IMO, German agents could only effect the war in a couple of ways: Passive observation and intelligence gathering Attacks against soft, low value targets to spread terror an hysteria Attacks against lightly protected, unprotected civilian infrastructure.. telephone lines, power stations, starting fires Attacking / sabotaging military targets is romantic but not practical. __________________ http://www.BOOKSonWAR.com/ .

05-26-2008, 02:55 PM	#7
syscom3 Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 10,814	The US industrial machine was so vast, theres nothing the commando team could have done to materially effect the war. __________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"

05-26-2008, 03:33 PM	#10
Soren Banned Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 6,625	Hehe, no no, I'm not talking about another dambuster raid. But I do believe that exploding the dam was possible, but it would be a very tough task and a commando team wouldn't be capable of it. Last edited by Soren; 05-26-2008 at 03:43 PM.

05-26-2008, 01:19 PM	#3
Soren Banned Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 6,625	Hehe FLYBOYJ, those were spy operations, which is completely different from a commando attack.

05-26-2008, 01:26 PM	#5
Soren Banned Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 6,625	Very interesting links nonetheless FLYBOYJ, thanks.

05-26-2008, 02:06 PM	#6
Haztoys Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Prescott Arizona USA Posts: 507	If I were running the the Axis..I would of done more moves like you have said here Sorens .... Not that it would of helped militarily per say as to win land or said battle...But as in the Dambusters move ...The wreaked dams did not stop the Germans factory's.. But it did tied up men and machines that should and could of been used else were... Workers had to fix the dam ..The workers were pulled from the Atlantic Wall to fix the dam ...And the Germans moved troops to defend the dams...That could of been at D-day and the Eastern Front...

05-26-2008, 03:01 PM	#8
Soren Banned Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 6,625	What about blowing up the hoover dam ?

05-26-2008, 03:51 PM	#11
pbfoot Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: niagara falls Posts: 5,964	according to what I've heard Goebbels threatened my neck of the woods with its hydro electric capacity and the chemical and abrasives industries whether this folk lore or not I don't know.

05-26-2008, 04:03 PM	#12
syscom3 Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 10,814	Hoover dam has survived a mag 5 quake. No amount of explosives is going to take this one out. Damaging the power generators or transmission towers would be a good bet. But its not the only power source for California. __________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"

05-26-2008, 04:11 PM	#13
DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crewchief Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany Posts: 34,086	In the end I do not think it would have accomplished anything. Blowing up the Hoover Damn would hurt a small portion of America. The US's resources were spread out all over the United States. A "terrorist" attack would have put fear into the people, but in the end it would have only rallied the US people even more and given them more resolve to end the war and more than likely "punish" Germany on an even greater scale. __________________ fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

05-26-2008, 07:08 PM	#14
RabidAlien Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Hurst, Texas Posts: 3,484	I don't think a commando attack on the US, anywhere, would've done Germany any good. Keep in mind that the country was really unified after Pearl Harbor. Even the Isolationists were all for attacking and gettin some back. A commando attack would not have done any good....raids that small, in a country that has no "front line borders" anywhere near it, would not have diverted any significant amount of troops from critical front line positions. Raids that small, in a country with such a huge industrial capability, would not have slowed production or distribution of war materiel in any insignificant way. The Japanese managed to surface a submarine and fire a few shells on the west coast, damaging (I believe) an un-occupied carnival or something like it...no military benefits whatsoever. All they managed to do was to get the civilians to organize themselves into a sort of neighborhood-watch....not the military, but the civilians. So, unless the commando raid happened to take out pretty much every military and civilian leader at once, it would've done nothing more than really piss off the populace and get a group of skilled military men killed/captured for no reason whatsoever. Also keep in mind that, to pull it off successfully, they would've had to come in in Allied uniforms/clothes, not German uniforms. Therefore, if caught, they would be treated as spies and subject to execution according to the Geneva Convention. If they had tried it, I believe the best thing they could've done would be to land small groups to, as stated earlier, mine beaches and coastal waterways and roadways. Yes, they would've eventually been caught, but nighttime commando raids would've had a slightly longer longevity than one or two "terroristic" strikes. The submarines, while waiting for the commandos to perform their missions, could surface and fire off a few deck-gun rounds at targets of opportunity, such as wealthy mansions (nuttin like a couple of pissed off rich folks to put pressure on the military to divert a trainload of troops or two!) or factories. America and Canada, however, have the rather unique advantage of not sharing common borders with a bunch of different, potentially beligerent, nations. Anything out to get us would have to cross alot of water. So all of our output can be channeled into the offensive, instead of split between offense and defense. My head hurts now from all this thinking...if such it can be called. g ETA: Erich Gimpel wrote a book about his experience as a spy. I used to own the book, but can't find it...probably got stuck in the wrong pile and went to Half-Price Books at some point. Here's the Amazon.com link: Amazon.com: Agent 146: The True Story of a Nazi Spy in America: Erich Gimpel: Books __________________ Pillage, then burn. Argue not with dragons, for thou art crunchy and go well on toast. Last edited by RabidAlien; 05-26-2008 at 07:20 PM.

05-26-2008, 07:42 PM	#15
Soren Banned Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 6,625	The thing I find confusing here is that some seem to suggest that the US wasn't already doing all it could when it hadn't suffered commando raid. In my mind that makes no sense at all. The US industry was running as fast as it could right after Pearl Harbour, so a Commando could only hamper that to some degree, it certainly wouldn't strenghten it.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode