ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 42
Like Tree2Likes

Hypothetical Scenario: Java 1942

WW2 General Discuss Hypothetical Scenario: Java 1942 in the World War II - General forums; Hello everybody- I was talking with Parsifal via PM about how the outcome of Java Sea could be different. While ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member Vassili Zaitzev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Connecticut, United States
    Posts
    2,953
    Country
    United States

    Hypothetical Scenario: Java 1942

    Hello everybody-

    I was talking with Parsifal via PM about how the outcome of Java Sea could be different. While wargaming is above my experience, I wish to start a discussion on the topic. I have a basic understanding of the battle, and how Doorman was stopped several times attempting to intercept the invasion convoy.

    I guess I can make this a two pronged question: 1. Historically, could the ABDA have done anything different to change the outcome? 2. This would be a what if scenario. For example: If HMS Hood was not destroyed at the Denmark Straits, survived up till '42, and was sent along with HMS Exeter to the Far East, what impact would she have made? (A little warning: From what I gather for wargames, if one side can change their parameters, so can the other. So if HMS Hood is included for the ABDA, than the IJN can include other forces, say the Kirishima?)

    Have fun guys! Mind the size of the images.

    I'm sure a lot of you are familiar with the battle, but I'll include a few links and a map.
    Battle of the Java Sea - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    The Java Sea Battle, February 1942
    The Battle of the Java Sea: February 27, 1942, by Vincent P. O'Hara
    jav-batarvo.jpg
    jav-batnite.jpg

    "Never was so much owed by so many to so few"- Winston Churchill.

  2. #2
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,236
    Country
    United States

    Intelligence is the key.

    Winning the battle means sinking Imperial Japanese Army transports before they can land troops.
    Japanese warships should be mostly avoided until after the transports are sunk.
    Intelligence is the key if you want to slip between IJA transports and their IJN escort. You might also employ a decoy.

    Attack at night.
    Sacrifice a couple cruisers for the IJN to chase (and probably kill).
    After the IJN (hopefully) take the cruiser bait every available ABDA destroyer falls on the IJA transport fleet. Don't piddle around. Use torpedoes for quick results. Any transports still floating after torpedoes are gone get killed with gunfire. After transports are sunk the mission is over. ABDA ships including any surviving cruisers from the decoy force should flee into the darkness at flank speed. There is nothing to be gained by fighting IJN warships.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Vassili Zaitzev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Connecticut, United States
    Posts
    2,953
    Country
    United States
    Interesting scenario. I wonder though if the American torpedoes would be effective, the early ones had a tendency to be duds.
    "Never was so much owed by so many to so few"- Winston Churchill.

  4. #4
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,236
    Country
    United States

    Wonder if American torpedoes would be effective

    ABDA cannot do anything to change that situation. Just fire all torpedoes and let the chips fall where they may. If torpedoes don't get the job done then gunfire will.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Vassili Zaitzev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Connecticut, United States
    Posts
    2,953
    Country
    United States
    Guess your right. I just wonder if the DD's can take care of the transport fleet before the IJN neutralize the cruiser diversion. Still, sinking even a fraction of the invasion fleet is better than the historical outcome.
    "Never was so much owed by so many to so few"- Winston Churchill.

  6. #6
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,236
    Country
    United States
    wonder if the DD's can take care of the transport fleet before the IJN neutralize the cruiser diversion
    It doesn't take much to sink a transport. Not even with 4" guns like the USN flush deck DDs had. And they certainly cannot run away from a destroyer.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Vassili Zaitzev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Connecticut, United States
    Posts
    2,953
    Country
    United States
    Point taken.
    "Never was so much owed by so many to so few"- Winston Churchill.

  8. #8
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,236
    Country
    United States

    USN Asiatic Fleet

    U.S. Navy, 7.12.1941
    Submarines and aircraft aside, they had 13 destroyers and two cruisers. Plenty for attacking a transport fleet but you cannot piddle them away. They must be held in readiness outside enemy air range and wait for a troop transport fleet to appear. Then you attack with the entire Asiatic Fleet. A more aggressive Asiatic Fleet commander might have attempted this in the Philippines.

    H.M. Australian Squadron, RAN, 8.12.41
    Australia had a significant fleet too. 5 cruisers and 4 destroyers. The same strategy applies. You cannot piddle them away escorting the RN around Malaya. The RN ought to know how to fight a naval battle and assemble a balanced fleet. They shouldn't need Australian help.

    The entire Australian fleet should be held back in the vicinity of Borneo or the East Indies, waiting for a chance to attack IJA troop transports en masse.

  9. #9
    Senior Member renrich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montrose, Colorado
    Posts
    4,534
    Country
    United States
    If Hood had been present in the Java Sea, she would have been sunk just like Repulse and POW. ABDA was hopelessly outclassed in every way and was doomed.

  10. #10
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,236
    Country
    United States

    ABDA was hopelessly outclassed

    ABDA was well equipped for sinking IJA troop transports and that's how amphibious invasions are defeated.

  11. #11
    Senior Member renrich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montrose, Colorado
    Posts
    4,534
    Country
    United States
    The only way that ABDA was going to have any success against invasion forces was at night and the IJN was the master of the night at that time. ABDA was well equipped with nothing. The ships were worn out and outclassed. The men were worn out. Many of the weapons either did not work or were outclassed. The leadership was poor and the communications were hopeless. There were shortages of everything and ABDA did not control the air or ground. The Boise was just dad gummed lucky to hit a rock. Other than that, they were in good shape. They had a little success at Balikpapan but that was a pinprick against the IJN. My uncle swapped out with another petty officer who wanted to go to the Asiatic Fleet and that fellow wound up on the Houston and my uncle went to the Salt Lake City. Guess who survived the war?
    Last edited by renrich; 05-29-2012 at 03:31 PM.

  12. #12
    Senior Member renrich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montrose, Colorado
    Posts
    4,534
    Country
    United States
    The DDs four inch guns would have a dickens of a time trying to sink a cargo ship. When submarines used to surface and try to sink a ship with their deck guns, it would take many rounds to get the job done. The DDs could not do it at night because they could not see to shoot and in the daylight they could not hang around long enough to get the job done. The US torpedoes mostly did not work and they were in short supply also.

  13. #13
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,236
    Country
    United States

    leadership was poor

    The real problem.

    The IJN were not supermen. They had good leaders who knew how to train ship crew. With good leadership ABDA could fight at night also.

  14. #14
    Senior Member renrich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montrose, Colorado
    Posts
    4,534
    Country
    United States
    If you read up on the Pacific war you realise that the USN did not get proficient at night surface engagements until well into 1943 and even then they had many mix ups because of the teething problems with radar. My uncle in Salt Lake City was in the Battle of Cape Esperance which was after the disaster at Savo Island. Cape Esperance was, more or less, an American victory. After the American cruisers opened fire at close range on the IJN ships the US flagship ordered them to cease fire because it was thought we were firing on our own DDs. Some of the cruisers complied but my uncle said Salt Lake City did not comply because they knew they were firing on IJN ships. My uncle was the CGM in charge of the 5 inch/38s and they were firing as fast as they could becuse they had crossed the T of the Japanese. My other uncle was a CGM on Chicago at Savo Island. Chicago was the only Allied CA that survived although heavily damaged. He said they were totally surprised and had no idea the Japanese were about until Chicago was hit with a torpedo. The IJN were pretty close to being supermen when it came to night surface engagements for the first couple of years in the war.

    The leadership of ABDA was Dutch and the Allied "fleet" was a scratch group with little or no experience working together. There were language problems and signals problems. The Allies had very little knowledge about IJN torpedo doctrine and night fighting ability. It was a fiasco waiting to happen and it did. It would have made little difference if the Allied force had been homogeneous and all one nationality at that stage of the war. At Coral Sea and Midway, the US commanders were smart enough to know they wanted nothing to do with the IJN in a night surface engagement. They had little choice later at Guadalcanal.

    Was reading a book a number of years ago about the Java campaign and it told the story of Houston getting ready to leave the harbor at Surabaya (sp?) for what turned out to be the Battle Of the Java Sea. A British CA, either Exeter or an Aussie CL, Perth ( I think it was Perth) had her band lined up on the fantail as they steamed out of harbor. The band was playing " A Hunting We Will Go" That account brought tears to my eyes (and still does) to think about what was in store for our sailors.
    Last edited by renrich; 05-30-2012 at 12:03 PM.

  15. #15
    Senior Member freebird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    British Columbia
    Posts
    2,628
    Country
    Canada
    Country II
    United Kingdom
    Quote Originally Posted by Vassili Zaitzev View Post
    Hello everybody-

    I was talking with Parsifal via PM about how the outcome of Java Sea could be different. While wargaming is above my experience, I wish to start a discussion on the topic. I have a basic understanding of the battle, and how Doorman was stopped several times attempting to intercept the invasion convoy.

    I guess I can make this a two pronged question: 1. Historically, could the ABDA have done anything different to change the outcome? 2. This would be a what if scenario. For example: If HMS Hood was not destroyed at the Denmark Straits, survived up till '42, and was sent along with HMS Exeter to the Far East, what impact would she have made?
    A more plausible scenario might be if the Prince of Wales & Repulse are withdrawn as soon as Japan attacks, and sent (along with HMS Hermes perhaps) as cornerstone of "ABDA".
    Perhaps as part of a deception plan they take a well publicized short trip up to Hawaii in late Dec to put in an appearance and have Japan think that they are part of the West Coast fleet.
    PoW is a new ship and has a modern radar set.

    Another option is if the Allies deploy some radar equipped naval strike aircraft.


    Great maps BTW!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86