![]() |
| |||||||
| WW2 General Every WW2 related discussion besides aviation. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 3,655
| Interesting what might have been I have been reading the Memoirs of Colonel Hans Von Luck who fought through the war with Rommel and speciailised in commanding reconisance forces. As we are all aware in the Middle East there was no front line as we normally know it. There were areas where both sides faced off against one another, but there were large gaps where small forces could penetrate. In late January there occurred what might well have been a massive change in the war. I quote. On 23rd January the British occupied Tripoli without a fight. A few days later a patrol reported 'Gathering of high millitary personnel six to eight KM to the Northeast, believe Monty identified, strong protection with tanks and scout cars. I went there at once and it did seem that Montgomery was there and more sensationally Churchill wearing a safari helmet. The range was too far for our light weapons and the 88mm and heavy artillary were not available. I later found out that it could have been Churchill, as he stopped on the way to Casablanca to meet Monty. Can you imagine what would have happened if they had the weapons and had been able to kill or capture Monty and Churchill in Jan 1943? |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Stockport
Posts: 162
| Quote:
__________________ If in doubt........Panic!!!!!!! | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
| I dont know if it was certain by Jan 43. Do you mean the war or victory in N. Afrika?
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,249
| I think that by that time Monty had really achieved his big part in North Afrika and if I understand it there was a lot of bickering between him and Patton which distracted from the main task. Therefore unity might have better been served not to have him on D-Day but politics said he was there for the British. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member | In democratic countries no one is irreplacable. Kris
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,249
| Debatable though how true that is in fact. Democracy in theory states the same thing as Communism- "That Everyone is Equal" but in practice certain people are better in certain situations. Monty was needed in the African Theatre but if he had died there after his victory there. D-Day might have ran a bit smoother for the Allies, as the Supreme Commander had to listen to him bickering with Ike. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member | Ever heard the story of how Hitler reacted when he heard the news of Roosevelt's death? When the allies were already invading Germany from two sides and defeat was imminent, he saw Providence coming to his rescue in the nick of time. Kris
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Montrose, Colorado
Posts: 3,271
| Hitler rejoicing when Roosevelt died showed how out of touch with reality he was. Roosevelt was so ill his last term he was not very effective as a leader. And Truman turned out to be not all that bad, huh? I believe Churchill would have been a much greater loss to the free world than Monty. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member | True but no longer in 1943. From that point his continuous concern for British interests in the Mediterranean were becoming a nuisance to Allied Command. Just look at the stunt he pulled in the Greek islands. Of course in hindsight it would have been good for the freedom of Eastern Europe had England invaded the Balkans. Kris
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Montrose, Colorado
Posts: 3,271
| I believe that Churchill had a legitimate and early concern about the Soviets that Roosevelt did not share. Much of the PMs meddling in the overall strategy of the war was a result of that concern. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Montrose, Colorado
Posts: 3,271
| Besides, if Churchill had been picked off during WW2 he would not have been able to plan "Operation Hope Not" his funeral. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Banned Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Land of hope and Glory
Posts: 295
| What was 'operation Hope Not' anyways? |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,249
| It is questionable though, whether Monty would really have been a great loss considering that the Afrika Corps was largely abandoned by Germany and dying a slow painful death. Monty delayed the hammer-blow falling on Rommel's neck and this allowed Rommel to escape to Germany. Therefore it could be questioned whether Monty was playing like a cat with a mouse with Afrika Corps when he could have delivered a swift mercifull blow and ended it quickly. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| More interesting US aircraft projects | R988 | Modern | 6 | 06-30-2006 02:56 PM |
| Interesting Website... | Wildcat | Aviation | 0 | 04-30-2006 08:32 AM |
| Interesting profiles | the lancaster kicks ass | Aircraft Pictures | 5 | 11-27-2005 12:54 PM |
| Interesting E-Bay items.. | Medvedya | OFF-Topic / Misc. | 46 | 11-07-2005 12:10 PM |
| An Interesting Aircraft | Andrew | Aviation | 21 | 06-14-2005 05:40 PM |