Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - General > WW2 General

WW2 General Every WW2 related discussion besides aviation.

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2006, 02:46 PM   1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,280
Landing Craft

Post your information for all the boats and vehicals used in WW2 for amphib warfare. For those of you that still think the Germans could have have invaded England, these are the craft they didnt have to be able to pull the invasion off.

I will start with his one. Perhaps one of the most important 'craft" developed in WW2. It revolutionized logistics as it could take the material directly from a larger ship inland. This advoided the time consuming and inefficent offloading on a beach and then reloading on terrestial trucks.

The DUKW (popularly pronounced DUCK) is a six-wheel-drive amphibious truck that was originally designed inside General Motors Corporation during World War II for transporting goods and troops over land and water and for use approaching and crossing beaches in amphibious attacks.

Its designation as a DUKW is not a military pun, the name comes from the terminology used for military vehicles in World War II; the D indicates a vehicle designed in 1942, the U meant "utility (amphibious)", the K indicated all-wheel drive and the W indicated two powered rear axles. The DUKW was built around a conventional six-wheel-drive military truck called the CCKW, with the addition of a watertight hull and a propeller. The vehicle was built by the GMC division of General Motors (called Yellow Truck and Coach at the beginning of the war). It was powered by a GMC Straight-6 engine of 270 in³ (4.4 L). The DUKW weighed 7.5 tons and operated at 6.4 mph (10 km/h) on water and 50 mph (80 km/h) on land. It was 31 feet (9.3 m) long, 8.25 feet (2.4 m) wide, and 8.8 feet (2.6 m) high with the folding-canvas top up. More than 21,000 were manufactured. Contrary to its outward appearance it was not an armored vehicle, being plated with sheet steel between 1/16" and 1/8" thick to keep the weight down. A high-capacity bilge pump system kept the DUKW afloat if the thin hull was breached by holes up to a couple inches in diameter.

The DUKW was the first vehicle to allow the driver to vary the tire pressure from inside the cab, an accomplishment of Speir's devise. The tires could be fully inflated for hard surfaces such as roads and less inflated for softer surfaces—especially beach sand. This added to the DUKW's great versatility as an amphibious vehicle. This feature is now standard on many military vehicles.

The DUKW was used in landings in the Pacific, in North Africa, and on the D-Day beaches of Normandy. With the enemy holding all available ports, DUKWs carried 18 million tons of supplies ashore in the 90 days following the landing

The DUKW's ability to board and debark without assistance via way of an LST's ramp enabled the ship to anchor offshore, thereby reducing reef and beach congestion and lessened the danger of enemy fire on ship and personnel. Furthermore, the hybrid's ability to cross coral reefs and sandy beaches and then proceed inland to wherever supplies were needed saved what would otherwise have been countless man-hours of handling supplies. The DUKW's versatility forestalled the necessity to bring heavy transport vehicles ashore during early stages of invasions, further reducing island and beach congestion.

Rated capacity – 5000 lbs.
270 cid 6–cylinder GMC motor.
Weight 14,800–Lbs.
Rated at, governed, 6.4 mph water and 50 mph land.
21,000+ manufactured–WWII only.
$10,800.00 cost.
Marines–two man crew, driver and assistant driver.
Tire inflation/deflation by driver from inside cab.
First operational use in Pacific at Noumea, 1943, in Europe at Sicily, 1943.

D-Day info:
D Day Tanks and countdown to 60th anniversary of D-Day from the Tank Museum Bovington

USMC info:
MARINE DUKWS IN WWII
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 760px-DUKW_1.jpg (74.7 KB, 114 views)
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2006, 02:57 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
MacArther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 876
Send a message via Yahoo to MacArther
I know that rockets were tested as weapons for the DUKW's but was there any sort of "normal" weapon's fit for defense or suppression fire? Also, do you know what kind of personal weapons were usually carried by the crews of the DUKWs?
__________________
http://www.fictionpress.com/u/478009/
Hillary 2012: The world has to end sometime!
MacArther is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2006, 03:02 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,280
Ive seen specifications for the provisionng of a single .50 MG. Generally, they were not armed as they were not intended to be assaulting defended beaches.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2006, 03:42 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Hunter368's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,240
Good thread idea syscom. Educational, keep it coming. Amphibious warfair 101 we can call it.
__________________


"Ivan the Terrible or Russian Achilles" Ivan Kozhedub - Hero of the USSR (x3), Order of Lenin (x2), Order of Red Banner (x7), Order of Alexander Nevsky, Order of the Great Patriotic War (x2), Order of the Red Star (x2), 62 kills during 1943-1945
Hunter368 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2006, 03:15 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,280
LCT

These are quite an interesting type of landing craft. In fact, they were indispensible in helping the allies to get tanks and heavy eqmt ashore quickly. Several types were made, but all did the same thing. As I keep saying, the Germans didnt have these types of boats to transport their heavy eqmt and tanks right up onto an unimproved beach. This is further proof that their planned invasion of England was not going to work. And its further evidence of the superior logistical system of the US and UK.

World War II LCTs
Landing craft tank - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

After the evacuation from Dunkirk it was seen that the only feasible way for the Allies to fight in Europe was by landing on its beaches. Churchill's suggestion for a boat capable of carrying one or more tanks led to a concerted approach to designs for "Combined Operations" craft. British constructors met in mid 1940 and drew up designs that led to one of them, Hawthorn Leslie, producing the first "Tank Landing Craft" in November 1940. This was the LCT Mk I also recorded as "LCT(1)".

The LCT was produced in several configurations, the two US ones were the Mark V and Mark VI. LCT Mk Vs had only a bow ramp while LCT Mk VIs had both bow and stern ramps. They were much smaller than the Landing ship, Tank (or LST), a larger amphibious assault ship for landing tanks which was capable of hauling and launching an LCT. They were unarmored and only lightly armed. LCT were not given names, only numbers. A large number were given through lend-lease to the UK and a small number to the USSR.

Besides being used to transport tanks, men or supplies, the LCT was a suitable platform for conversion and were modified for special duties for the invasion of Normandy in June 1944. To provide anti-aircraft protection for the convoys and during the assault itself several LCTs were converted into floating AA batteries, the LCT(4) conversions receiving the new designation LCF(4) "Landing Craft, Flak" and so forth. Some LCTs were fitted with guns or rockets (the later becoming Landing Craft, Tank (Rocket)) or as repair barges or minesweepers. Twenty-six of them had armor added, making them LCT(A), Landing Craft Tank (Armored) however, this reduced their load from 4 tanks to 3.

Production
US Production: A total of 1,435 of these craft were built, including 965 built during WWII. Most of the US LCT's were built at the Darby Steel Plant in the West Bottoms of Kansas City, Kansas. The ships were then floated more than 1,000 miles down the Missouri and Mississippi rivers to New Orleans, Louisiana prompting the ships to be nicknamed the "Prairie Ships."

UK production: 864 LCT(4)s were built. A British LCT, HM LCT (3) 7074 is owned by the Warship Preservation Trust and moored on the Wirral in England.

Note - I found the picture of the LCT being offloaded from the LST interesting, as my neighbor (who was an WW2 LST crewman) told me that their voyage from Pearl Harbor to the Philipines involved them carrying an LCT (or LCI) out there for the planned invasion of Japan.

Note - MK4's were UK built. MK5's were US Built

LCT Mk IV specifications
Length: 185.5 ft long
Draught: about 3 ft
Capacity: 9 M4 Sherman or 9 Cromwell tanks or 6 Churchill tanks, or 300 tons of cargo.
Armament: as the LCF(4): 8 20 mm Oerlikon cannon, 4 2pdr (40 mm) Pom-Pom (gun)s.

LCT Mk V specifications
Displacement: 133 tons (135 t), 286 (291 t) tons (landing)
Length: 117 ft (35.7 m)
Beam: 32 ft (9.8 m)
Draft: 2 ft 10 in (0.9 m) forward, 4 ft 2 in (1.3 m) aft (landing)
Speed: 8 knots (15 km/h)
Armament: 2 x 20 mm
Complement: 1 officer, 12 enlisted
Capacity: 5 x 30-ton (27 t) or 4 x 40-ton (36 t) or 3 x 50-ton (45 t) tanks; or 9 trucks; or 150 short tons (136 t) cargo
3 Gray 225 hp (168 kW) diesels; triple screws
Attached Images
File Type: jpg lct20.jpg (30.5 KB, 102 views)
File Type: jpg Lst-lct.jpg (85.2 KB, 102 views)
File Type: jpg mk5diagram.jpg (53.7 KB, 102 views)
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"

Last edited by syscom3; 10-04-2006 at 03:40 PM.
syscom3 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006, 05:51 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,249
Don't forget that German Vehicle, the jeep like one with the propeller that can go in water. I have temporarily forgotten its name. But it counts as amphibious.
HealzDevo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006, 05:56 PM   #7
"World Traveller"
 
Gnomey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK
Posts: 15,220
Send a message via AIM to Gnomey Send a message via MSN to Gnomey
Schimmwagen.

VW-Schwimmwagen type 166 - The Schwimmwagen Registry
VW-Schwimmwagen type 166 - The Schwimmwagen Registry
__________________


"Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill

"To him the People of the World Largely owe the Freedom and Liberties they Enjoy Today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London


WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum

My Photo Collections on Flickr
Gnomey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006, 06:04 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,945
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
never seen that one before! hardly a landing craft though........
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006, 09:06 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,280
I hardly think that can be seriously considered as usefull in an amphib invasion.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 01:51 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
MacArther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 876
Send a message via Yahoo to MacArther
Lemme refrase that question about the DUKW, I had seen it mentioned as having been used by the British with Rockets, flamethrowers, and other weapons later in the War in the European theatre. Any idea if there were actual designations for these fittings, or if they were field fits?
__________________
http://www.fictionpress.com/u/478009/
Hillary 2012: The world has to end sometime!
MacArther is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 08:05 AM   #11
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
It was not meant for amphibious invasions but rather for crossing rivers during attacks.
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 09:52 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Stockport
Posts: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacArther View Post
Lemme refrase that question about the DUKW, I had seen it mentioned as having been used by the British with Rockets, flamethrowers, and other weapons later in the War in the European theatre. Any idea if there were actual designations for these fittings, or if they were field fits?
I've been interested in British armour since I was little, yet I've never come across any reference to the DUKW being fitted with rockets, or any other weapon, while in British service.
__________________
If in doubt........Panic!!!!!!!
redcoat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 07:54 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 241
Noumea?

Quote:
First operational use in Pacific at Noumea, 1943, in Europe at Sicily, 1943.
What kind of use in Noumea? It was in allied hand since 1942, a major Us navy port.

Max
maxs75 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 12:08 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxs75 View Post
What kind of use in Noumea? It was in allied hand since 1942, a major Us navy port.

Max
It meant they were first used in New Caledonia in 1943 to help offlaod allied shipping.

That statement didnt imply they were used in combat situations.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2006, 07:57 AM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Land of hope and Glory
Posts: 295
What was the name of the British landing craft on D-day? It wasent the Higgins boats as the doors opend sidewards.
Joe2 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/ww2-general/landing-craft-5367.html
Posted By For Type Date
Teller 1 Pagina Overzicht: Belstat MAX Nederland gratis web site statistieken, tellers, web site analyse, bezoek This thread Refback 10-29-2006 10:49 AM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Mk V Special Operations Craft... lesofprimus Modern 10 08-09-2005 12:02 PM
The Best Bf - 109 Variant ? lesofprimus Aviation 522 07-13-2005 12:35 AM
Possible End of the ww2 hellmaker Old Threads 300 06-13-2005 06:22 PM
The exploits of my first carrier landing! *11 PICTURES HERE* GermansRGeniuses IL-2 Sturmovik Pilot's Lounge 34 05-10-2005 02:29 PM
The Story of Charles Hoffman Crazy Stories 4 06-19-2004 08:50 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:23 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118