ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 52
Like Tree1Likes

Light tanks for the beligerents

WW2 General Discuss Light tanks for the beligerents in the World War II - General forums; Hi, all, The light tanks were produced & used on large scale during the ww2, many times doubling as the ...

  1. #1
    Creator of Interesting Threads tomo pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,498
    Country
    Croatia

    Light tanks for the beligerents

    Hi, all,
    The light tanks were produced & used on large scale during the ww2, many times doubling as the 'front line' tanks, helping out the infantry, in the teeth of the AT guns. How would the light tanks looked if you were calling the shots? The upper limit is 15 tons prior 1942, 20 tons from 1942 and on, each country using only 'domestic' engines & weaponry, along with historical suspension set-ups. If the tank can be used as a platform for different kinds of AFVs, it scores extra points )



    EDIT: I agree that in 1939/40 the 15 ton tanks were in 'medium' category, so the category of 'under 10 tons, prior July 1940' is added
    Last edited by tomo pauk; 04-20-2012 at 12:27 PM. Reason: new category added

  2. #2
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,239
    Country
    United States

    upper limit is 15 tons prior 1942

    1935. German Army specification for a 15 ton tank with main gun up to 5cm in size.
    The Panzer III won the competition.

    This tank gets my vote. How many other 15 ton light tanks had potential for upgrade to a 22 ton MBT by 1940?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lazio
    Posts
    2,072
    Country
    Italy
    imho 15 tons it's too high for a light early in the war
    Pz II 10 tons
    L 6 7 tons
    Type 95&98 7.5 tons
    Tetrarch 7.5 Tons
    T-26 10 Tons
    T-60 6 Tons
    T-70 9 Tons

  4. #4
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,239
    Country
    United States

    10 ton limit. Panzer II.

    The 10 ton Panzer II performed well for a vehicle of that size and it was dirt cheap, costing only about 50,000 RM. The relatively powerful 2cm KwK30 or KwK38 autocannon was effective against both soft targets and light armor. Frontal armor was upgraded to 30mm during 1940 which is pretty good for a vehicle of that size. The same chassis could be used for a low cost 10.5cm SP howitzer or 7.5cm SP AT gun.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,328
    Country
    United States
    Light tanks, for the most part were a waste of resources. They were popular because they were cheap and/or could be built in factories that could not build "medium" tanks. Once in combat, while they did perform good service at times, it was usually at a high cost both in tanks and crews. The only real role they had in the European Theater was as tracked reconnaissance vehicles when the terrain/weather bogged wheeled vehicles. Asia was a bit different as the Japanese never had much beyond light tanks and had rather weak anti-tank guns so US Light tanks could perform there ( they also fit better in the landing craft). Using light tanks as a chassis for other types of AFV's also presents problems. Just because a certain size gun could be mounted or was mounted on a light tank chassis doesn't mean is was really a good idea. It may have been better than no tracked chassis under that gun but that may not be saying much. Small chassis restrict gun crew numbers and room to operate which affects rate of fire, small chassis also mean restricted ammunition storage which either means restricted engagement times or bombardments or extra tracked chassis to keep an adequate supply of ammo on hand. Needing 6 chassis for 4 barrels to have a decent supply of ammo doesn't look so good compared to 4 medium chassis for 4 barrels and about the same total amount of ammunition.

    The British had a good light tank for helping the infantry, it was called the Valentine.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,328
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    1935. German Army specification for a 15 ton tank with main gun up to 5cm in size.
    The Panzer III won the competition.

    This tank gets my vote. How many other 15 ton light tanks had potential for upgrade to a 22 ton MBT by 1940?
    Again with the superior German designs? The 1935 15 ton "design" went through at least 3 different suspensions and 3 transmissions by the time the "E" went into production in Dec of 1938 about 70 total of the A, B, C and D models were built.

    15 toms was firmly in the medium category in 1935.

    The MK II shows the limits of the "light" category rather well. Unless the enemy offers up softballs like the British Light tank MK VI or some of the early Russian light tanks (t-37/38 or T-40) it's role quickly became tracked reconnaissance or a desperation attempt to make up numbers.
    30mm armor was darn near useless against anything heavier than 20mm cannon or those short French 37mm guns.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    159
    Country
    Canada
    15 tons is too big for light tank before WW-II. I would agree 10 tons good mark. I would vote for Cz tanks of this weight range.the T-35 and then T-38. Also good as medium tanks in a pinch and later excellent for SPAT vehicles ; SP infantry gun vehicles and further evolution into Assault gun like "Hetzer" design and 13 ton Weapons Carrier like "Waffentragger" .

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lazio
    Posts
    2,072
    Country
    Italy
    the Pz 35 & 38 were used as medium tank (despite they weighted around as a Pz II).
    also the M3 Stuart (13 tons early models, called light tank from US) were initially used as cruiser tank

  9. #9
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,239
    Country
    United States

    Light tanks, for the most part were a waste of resources

    That depends on when they were built. Prior to 1941 light tanks such as the Soviet BT-5 ruled the battlefield. Heavier tanks existed during the 1930s but they were relatively few in number.

  10. #10
    Creator of Interesting Threads tomo pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,498
    Country
    Croatia
    I've set the limits in order to cut down on the number of categories, but, upon the popular request, I'll ad another category (and edit the opening post here accordingly): under 10 tons, prior July 1940.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lazio
    Posts
    2,072
    Country
    Italy
    Tomo i known this is your thread, so sorry
    no italian tanks used v/s allies weight more 15 ton, a model used vs germans weight around 16 tons, as september '43
    Japanese common medium tank until the end was Type 97 a 15 ton, the maybe used Type 1 in late '44) is a 17 tons
    Pz 35&38 were used as medium tank in Barbarossa
    as writed before M3 Stuart were used as cruiser tank in fall 41 i think also in winter 41/42.
    in the 30s all tank with a gun are medium, also a Pz II, july 1940 maybe a minim date for take the 10 tons as light previously are medium

  12. #12
    Creator of Interesting Threads tomo pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,498
    Country
    Croatia
    No problems, Vincenzo

    Different countries had different categorizations, so it's my intention to call all the tanks that fit under these weight/time categories as 'light tanks'. The designs' particular for this thread should, however, be connected at the best possible layouts, rather that at the real ones.
    Maybe it would be cool if we had polls that cover the real lights, though.

  13. #13
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,239
    Country
    United States

    polls that cover the real lights

    Why bother? APCs like the 8 ton Sd.Kfz. 251 3/4 track were arguably superior to any "tank" weighing less then 10 tons.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lazio
    Posts
    2,072
    Country
    Italy
    superior for? is halftracked so has not same mobility (maybe worst sometime, maybe best othertime), as not gun turret so in less tactical flexible, as less armour and as you told is a APC or also AFV so is an other thing.


    as possible layout, taking out, the 1939/40 campaign. i think we can put a limit a 10 tons from '41 to spring 42, up slowly to reach 20 tons in '45 (minim winter 44/45)

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,328
    Country
    United States
    APCs are big targets with open tops that cry out for air burst artillery fire.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86