![]() |
| |||||||
| WW2 General Every WW2 related discussion besides aviation. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member | Matilda & Churchill, British Infantry tanks in action. A topic devoted to the most sucessful and heavily armored british tanks of ww2. Last edited by CharlesBronson; 11-05-2008 at 08:07 PM. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Stafford Springs, Connecticut
Posts: 2,221
| Cool. I read somewhere, that during the Battle of France, a group of Matilda tanks counterattacked against German Panzers. They did pretty well until Rommel brought up flak 88's against them. ah, here it is Battle of Arras (1940 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
__________________ "Never was so much owed by so many to so few"- Winston Churchill. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member | Yes it was probably the finest hour of the ugly Matilda 1. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Stafford Springs, Connecticut
Posts: 2,221
| Yeah, heavy armor, but small gun (2-pounder), limited speed and manuverablity proved it's downfall. The Cromwell proved to better suited though.
__________________ "Never was so much owed by so many to so few"- Winston Churchill. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member | Well, yeah, but the Cromwell was a cruiser so it was designed from the begining to be more mobile and fast, the british infantry tank doctrine favoured a slow moving but heavily armored tank, with armamend to destroy enemy armor in order to protect the advancing infantry, however the lack of a suitable HE capable gun was very anoyying in some teathers of operations, like in Africa. Matilda I knocked out in Arras. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member | Sevicing the Mark I "dreadnought" in France, may 1940. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Stafford Springs, Connecticut
Posts: 2,221
| Okay, sorry, what do you mean by HE capable gun. Do you mean High Explosive. Sorry, my tank knowledge is a bit rusty.
__________________ "Never was so much owed by so many to so few"- Winston Churchill. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member | Yes, the 2 pounder didnt use HE ammunition until 1943, wich was a bit late. In fact I must correct myself , the gun was capable of shooting explosive rounds but simple there was no provition for that, all the ammo carried was steel core AP. There was a variant with a 76 mm howitzer, but it used smoke bombs mostly. Profile of the "Gamecok", a Matilda II mark I captured in France, note the tailskid designed for avoid falling in a wide trench. also it had the increased clearance wich improved cross country capabilities but increased stress on suspension parts. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Stafford Springs, Connecticut
Posts: 2,221
| Okay, I think I get it now. Lack of HE rounds in North Africa would have been a pain in the as@. AP rounds could be used against APCs and panzers, but would be completey useless against AT guns, bunkers, or soft skinned vehicles.
__________________ "Never was so much owed by so many to so few"- Winston Churchill. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member | And against infantry too. A general description of the Matilda II mark II Last edited by CharlesBronson; 11-04-2008 at 05:21 PM. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member | - A12 prototype. - suspension squematic -top view of the Matilda II mark I, with its water cooled ,303 vickers, later replaced by the Besa 7,92mm in the mark II. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Stafford Springs, Connecticut
Posts: 2,221
| Cool, thanks for the info.
__________________ "Never was so much owed by so many to so few"- Winston Churchill. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Stafford Springs, Connecticut
Posts: 2,221
| Here's some pics on the Churchill, sorry there just links, I have no clue on how to blow them up. http://www.warbirdphotographs.com/AT...hurchill-1.jpg http://www.dkimages.com/discover/pre...784/563758.JPG
__________________ "Never was so much owed by so many to so few"- Winston Churchill. Last edited by Vassili Zaitzev; 11-05-2008 at 08:00 PM. |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Senior Member | You have a button in the toolbar for posting pictures, is the fifth counting from the left, also you can upload it from you PC hard disk. The top one seems a Mark IV or VI. The other is the Churchill flamethrower known as Crocodrile. The Matilda in action agaist the italian, the WavelL counterofensive in late 1940 almost knocked out Italy from teh African continent causing apalling losses in the process. The attack was spearheaded by the Matildas. ![]() Quote:
![]() Matilda with fascine for trench crossing. ![]() Matilda II Mark II with special ramp for crossing the Bardia fortress wide antitank ditch. | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Stafford Springs, Connecticut
Posts: 2,221
| CB, thanks for the tip and info, great stuff. 25,000 to 75,000 huh? Usually the attacker needs a three to one advantage, not the other way around.
__________________ "Never was so much owed by so many to so few"- Winston Churchill. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |