Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - General > WW2 General

WW2 General Every WW2 related discussion besides aviation.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-30-2009, 10:49 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
comiso90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 3,294
T-Boat vs Gato Class

Both great machines.

The T-Boat played a critical role in strangling the Afrika Corps in the Med and hunting other U-boats in the North Atlantic.

The Gato class slaughtered Japanese shipping and with out a doubt, shortened the war... Imagine if she had reliable torpedoes!!!

You have to purchase 100 subs for both Atlantic and Pacific duty... which do u buy?



Gato class submarine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
.


.




British T class submarine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
.
__________________


http://www.BOOKSonWAR.com/
.
comiso90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 12:38 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
RabidAlien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 2,825
Nuttin against our British buds, but I'm gonna go with the Gato's. Give them reliable torpedoes and the war could be a lot shorter in the Pacific. How many freighters delivered their goods after hearing that tell-tale "klonk" as a dud torpedo bounced off the hull? How many Japanese troops showed up for battle armed and ready because their troopship made it through, and their supply ship dropped off enough food to keep them only half-starved, and well armed? How many Japanese torpedoes took down good Allied ships because their carriers were still floating? Given good weapons, the Gatos would have made a serious dent in the Japanese war-plan.
__________________


Pillage, then burn.

Argue not with dragons, for thou art crunchy and go well on toast.
RabidAlien is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 01:01 PM   #3
Minister of Whoopass
 
lesofprimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 17,501
Gotta agree with u RA, the Gato with decent torps shortens the War....
__________________
My IL2 Video Tribute to My Grandfather: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk

lesofprimus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 01:12 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
comiso90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 3,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by RabidAlien View Post
Nuttin against our British buds, but I'm gonna go with the Gato's. Give them reliable torpedoes and the war could be a lot shorter in the Pacific. How many freighters delivered their goods after hearing that tell-tale "klonk" as a dud torpedo bounced off the hull? How many Japanese troops showed up for battle armed and ready because their troopship made it through, and their supply ship dropped off enough food to keep them only half-starved, and well armed? How many Japanese torpedoes took down good Allied ships because their carriers were still floating? Given good weapons, the Gatos would have made a serious dent in the Japanese war-plan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lesofprimus View Post
Gotta agree with u RA, the Gato with decent torps shortens the War....
The Brit boats did shorten the war... It's easy to argue that w/o them, Rommel would have received more supplies and captured the Suez canal. That would have been a mess.. prob no D-Day in 1944

certainly the yank boats shortened the war too even with sh!tty torps.

Aside from shortening the war, why would you buy the Gato over the T- Boat?
__________________


http://www.BOOKSonWAR.com/
.
comiso90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 02:04 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 496
The answers are in the Wiki articles.

For fighting in the Med you take the smaller boat. a slightly smaller asw target. Transit distances are short. going back to base for more torpedoes is only a few days.

For fighting in the Pacific you take the Bigger boat,the Gato. 3,000 more miles of range, longer time on patrol given the transit distances, 24 torpedoes vrs 14 for combat duration once targets are found.

If you have to buy 100 subs you can buy more than one class/type

British orderd the Amphion class for fighting in the Pacific.
Shortround6 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 02:22 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
comiso90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 3,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shortround6 View Post
The answers are in the Wiki articles.

For fighting in the Med you take the smaller boat. a slightly smaller asw target. Transit distances are short. going back to base for more torpedoes is only a few days.

For fighting in the Pacific you take the Bigger boat,the Gato. 3,000 more miles of range, longer time on patrol given the transit distances, 24 torpedoes vrs 14 for combat duration once targets are found.

If you have to buy 100 subs you can buy more than one class/type

British orderd the Amphion class for fighting in the Pacific.
I agree.. it's the same old tired scenario.. "which is better".. of coarse there are missions that are better suited to each. I just want to learn more about each boat.


.
__________________


http://www.BOOKSonWAR.com/
.
comiso90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 05:34 PM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 69
For the Pacific and Indian ocean it has to be the big USN Gato because of its habitability. For European coastal waters I would go for a Royal Navy U type.

HMS Upholder commanded by Lt/cdr Wanklyn was the most succesful RN submarine with 119,000 tons sunk during 24 patrols over 16 months.
fastmongrel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118