Frindly foes over the Falls

[D112]

Thank you!
I did not know what kind of results I would get until I saw the picture from the lab and I exclaimed myself " Je l'ai eu !" I got it!
I don't have a web site, so I spread my pictures along with these messages.

SBD Dauntless...

[D112]

Images from previous messages are restored here

[evangilder]

You don't need to repost those. All people have to do is go back a page in the thread.

[D112]

I had erased them by mistake, and then later I could edit my messages and put them back.

[evangilder]

My bad. I didn't look back a page. Nevermind. I was in the sun too long today and my brain is kinda all melty like.

[timshatz]

Nice shots, pretty cool. Good eye.

[D112]

Thank you timshatz, evangilder, Gnomey, Nonskimmer, sorry for the mixed up with my previous posts.

I notice something about my pictures. The copies on paper are just find and
not grainy even if I used 400 ASA 135mm films.
But the scanned images from negatives are giving these grainy images on
the screen.

I am wondering what would happened if I used 100 ASA films instead?
Should I also get images grainy like that once scanned?

I have to try it. But difference between 400 ASA and 100 ASA is 2 stops less
opening the f stops and then restrict depth of field...

Maybe the rull of thumb is what is taken with conventionnal films has to go
on paper, period...





Pierre