Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > News & Announcements :: READ > WWII Events

WWII Events Post World War II events you would like to announce: Airshows, signings, etc.. (PM Admin for Global Announcement)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-14-2009, 10:09 AM   #16
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by imalko View Post
When you look closely at the cockpit conopy on this newly built Me 262s doesn't it look strangely shaped in comparison with genuine Me 262 conopy?
I think they look the same. I think it is just the angle the pic is taken at. The new 262s are built to the same specs as the original ones. The only difference is the avionics and engines.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yerger View Post

I also heard something regards a similar new built FW-190 project
Yes here in Germany a company called Flugwerk has been building new Fw 190s for years now.

Flugwerk
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]

Last edited by DerAdlerIstGelandet; 06-14-2009 at 10:12 AM.
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 10:14 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
imalko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vojvodina, Serbia
Posts: 1,302
Probably you are right Adler, but still it looks different to me. More so because of what you said that new Me 262s are build to the same specs with difference only in engines and avionics. Maybe this has something to do with the fact that this new Me 262s reportedly can change from one seater to two seater configuration according to need and buyer's wish?
__________________

"Find your enemy and shoot him down - everything else is unimportant."
imalko is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 10:27 AM   #18
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by imalko View Post
Probably you are right Adler, but still it looks different to me. More so because of what you said that new Me 262s are build to the same specs with difference only in engines and avionics. Maybe this has something to do with the fact that this new Me 262s reportedly can change from one seater to two seater configuration according to need and buyer's wish?
My understanding is you can order 3 different aircraft.

1. Me 262 single seater
2. Me 262 two seater
3. Me 262 convertable from two seater to single seater
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 12:22 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
GrauGeist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Redding, California
Posts: 3,345
The Me262s are an exact replica, designed and built with the original plans with of course, the few mentioned upgrades.

It is so accurate, that the Messerschmitt Foundation has granted the new '262 actual production model assignments.

Me262A-1c - model based on the Me262A1-a

Me262B-1c - model based on the Me262B-1a

Me262A/B-c - convertable model, switches between the A1-a and B-1a

By the way, isn't Flugwerk making new P-51Ds also?
__________________

"Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future."
- Marcus Aurelius, Emperor of Rome


> I Support Doug Gillis <
GrauGeist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 03:07 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by imalko View Post
When you look closely at the cockpit conopy on this newly built Me 262s doesn't it look strangely shaped in comparison with genuine Me 262 conopy?
I thought that too. The new canopy windscreen doesn't have the correct sweep angle of the original. It's shallower giving the appearance of being more upright. You'd have thought this was an easy mould to shoot. But, it may be accurate if the original armored front glass is removed. Regardless, it looks wrong.
Sweb is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 03:38 PM   #21
the old Sage
 
Erich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 10,770
have seen the Chino Recon 262 years ago, and there was even talk behind the scenes of getting that thing operative.............no thanks !
__________________
Rip it up !
Erich is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 03:56 PM   #22
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrauGeist View Post

By the way, isn't Flugwerk making new P-51Ds also?
Yeah they just started making them as well.
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 05:11 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
GrauGeist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Redding, California
Posts: 3,345
Very cool!

It's great to have the originals flying, but I think that if they have more of the reproductions available, it'll lessen the chances of losing one of the originals to accidents.
__________________

"Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future."
- Marcus Aurelius, Emperor of Rome


> I Support Doug Gillis <
GrauGeist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 05:57 PM   #24
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 89
I never saw details or an in person flight of one of the new built 190s either. I'm sure and expensive top. But I'd still like one.

Dear Santa.........
Yerger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 11:16 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
BikerBabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Denmark.
Posts: 958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweb View Post
I thought that too. The new canopy windscreen doesn't have the correct sweep angle of the original. It's shallower giving the appearance of being more upright. You'd have thought this was an easy mould to shoot. But, it may be accurate if the original armored front glass is removed. Regardless, it looks wrong.
There is definitely a noticeable difference, but I think that it might have something to do with how tall the modern day pilots are.
I mean: There isn't much point in being curled up and getting tucked into a plane where there isn't much space, especially if you have to fly for a while. Plus I guess that even though the pilot's strapped in, there needs to be a bit of space if he - by some reason unknown to me - gets to fly upside down.

I know from experience that no matter how hard you strap in, your body gives a little from gravity when you're suspended upside down (- no naughty thoughts, boys! ), and therefore your body elongates a bit, demanding more space "topside".

Plus I think that there might be a little difference in height - from the pilots back then, who grew up in the 1910's and 1920's (The Great Depression/malnourishment) where ppl didn't know as much about the proper nourishment for babies and children, to today's men, who has grown up with proper food, care and under circumstances that might be lightyears better than what could be experienced back then, thus improving their growth, and therefore demanding a larger cockpit canopy.
I don't know, it just makes sense to me. *scratches head*
__________________


Kein Anderer als ein Jäger spürt - Den Kampf und Sieg so konzentriert,
Das macht uns glücklich, stolz und froh - Der Jägerei ein Horrido!

BikerBabe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 11:40 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
wheelsup_cavu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Corona, California
Posts: 1,534
When I saw it I thought the same thing about the pilot's height BikerBabe.

Wheelsup
__________________
Cheers
Wheelsup_cavu

Wheels's Photos - Time lapse build of an F/A-18 Super Hornet - Lock N' Load
wheelsup_cavu is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 06:36 AM   #27
Senior Member
 
Lucky13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A Swede living in Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 15,121
Quote:
Originally Posted by BikerBabe View Post
I know from experience that no matter how hard you strap in, your body gives a little from gravity when you're suspended upside down (- no naughty thoughts, boys! ), and therefore your body elongates a bit, demanding more space "topside".
<Blank>

Wonder what'll be next a Arado 234, Heinkel 162....
__________________

JAN "Felicis Tredecim"
"I´m going back to the front to relax"
"THE BLACK CATS FLIES TONIGHT"
"Find your enemy and shoot him down - everything else is unimportant!"
"When you're out of F-8's... You're out of fighters!"

Lucky13 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 08:13 AM   #28
Senior Member
 
Wayne Little's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide Sth. Aust.
Posts: 12,487
How about a Ta152?....
__________________


Wayne Little is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 10:18 AM   #29
Senior Member
 
Lucky13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A Swede living in Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 15,121
Horten/Gotha-229! HOW cool would THAT be!?
__________________

JAN "Felicis Tredecim"
"I´m going back to the front to relax"
"THE BLACK CATS FLIES TONIGHT"
"Find your enemy and shoot him down - everything else is unimportant!"
"When you're out of F-8's... You're out of fighters!"

Lucky13 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 12:49 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
Flyboy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 646
If you go on Airliners.net and search for the Me.262 they have some pretty good pictures of this restored flying version
Flyboy2 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118