ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 234
Like Tree9Likes

1940: ideal fighter for the Luftwaffe?

Aviation Discuss 1940: ideal fighter for the Luftwaffe? in the World War II - Aviation forums; Okay, this time on the LW is to 'acquire' a super fighter Using the stuff historically produced in Germany, 1939/40, ...

  1. #1
    Creator of Interesting Threads tomo pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,592
    Country
    Croatia

    1940: ideal fighter for the Luftwaffe?

    Okay, this time on the LW is to 'acquire' a super fighter
    Using the stuff historically produced in Germany, 1939/40, and the state of the art of the late 1930s, how would the ideal fighter for the Luftwaffe looked like if you were in charge? Production starts in January 1940, so the new fighter can be used vs. the Western European air forces when the time comes. The plane should have great performance for the day, along with other capabilities that make a great war plane. A single engined design. The growth potential should be there, too.



    Answers like 'produce the He-100' or the 'Bf-109F' are wholeheartedly discouraged

  2. #2
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,382
    Country
    United States

    LW is to 'acquire' a super fighter

    1937.
    RLM gives DB603 engine program top priority for development and production.
    .....Reversal of historical decision to cancel DB603 funding during 1937.

    Autumn 1937. Historical event.
    RLM request for new fighter aircraft to supplement the Me-109.

    Late 1937 / early 1938.
    Dr Tank proposes new fighter aircraft design powered by the DB603 engine he historically preferred.

    1 June 1939. Fw-190 V1 prototype first flight.
    .....Historically with BMW 139 engine. In this scenerio it will fly with a DB603 prototype.

    31 Oct 1939. Fw-190 V2 prototype first flight.
    .....DB603 engine ILO the historical BMW 139.

    Historical Fw-190 development was delayed while waiting for a reliable engine. That's the case in this scenerio also. Our Fw-190 will enter mass production as soon as the DB603 engine passes a 100 hour endurance test. Should be NLT January 1941.

  3. #3
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,382
    Country
    United States

    Plan Fw-187

    I think a Fw-187 powered by DB601 engines qualifies as an Uber fighter during 1939 to 1942. Not single engine. However it's available earlier and you don't need to develop a new engine.

    Oct 1935. RLM provides 50 million RM for new DB601 engine factory.
    .....The original plan. Historically reduced to 20 million after an argument between Daimler-Benz management and RLM.

    1936. Historical.
    Fw-187 begins development as a private venture. Designed for DB601 engines.
    .....Full funding for Genshagen engine factory ensures there will be plenty of DB601 engines for this aircraft.

    1937. Historical.
    RLM request for new fighter aircraft.
    RLM request for new twin engine CAS aircraft armed with cannons.
    .....Variants of the Fw-187 can compete for both requirements.

    Spring 1937. Fw-187 prototye first flight.
    .....Historically RLM considered the Fw-187 only for the Zerstorer competition (vs Me-110). In this scenerio RLM will have enough DB601 engines that the Fw-187 can be considered for the day fighter competition.

    Historically the Zerstorer competition forced Focke Wulf to redesign the Fw-187 for a second crew member which delayed development for a year. No redesign in this scenerio so the Fw-187 single seat day fighter will be ready a year early.

    Feb 1938. Fw-187 A0 pre-production aircraft.
    .....A year ahead of historical development.

    Feb 1939. Fw-187A enters mass production.
    .....Single seat.
    .....Powered by two DB601A engines.
    .....4 x 20mm cannon mounted in fuselage sides.
    .....1,100 liters of internal fuel provide huge endurance for a 1939 fighter aircraft.

    Rechlin test pilot Heinrich Beauvais opinions concerning Fw-187.
    - Circled comparable to the Me-109.
    - Roll rate slightly less than the Me-109.
    - Top speed superior to the Me-109. ~30mph better.
    - Climb superior to the Me-109. ~300 feet per minute better.
    - Dive as good as the Me-109.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Rancho Cucamonga, California, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,795
    Country
    United States
    I think the Messerschmitt Me 109 with all-round vision canopy, rudder trim, 50% more fuel, and inward-retracting landing gear.

    If I had to pcik an existing German plane to be developed, without modifications as suggested above, I'd say the Heinkel He 112 shoed great potential, but the RLM hated Ernst Heinkel. I WOULD say the he 100, but I don;t think the plane was ready for production or combat as it existed at the time. The He 112, on the other hand, coule EASILY have been ready and available if the proposed Me 109 improvement is not in the spirit of the post.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,499
    Country
    United States
    Design a "bigger" fighter. around 210-220 sq ft of wing area. 500-600 liters of fuel internal. Inward retracting landing gear. Ditch the slats. The 109F was not a particularly low drag airframe for it's size and it was a huge step ahead of the 109E. It shouldn't be that hard to to get 109E performance with the bigger airframe even with the same engine.
    The bigger plane with the extra fuel will allow longer range/duration. It will operate from either worse air fields or have lower accidents. It may allow the carriage of more under wing/fuselage stores. It may offer more room in the wings for anti bomber armament in later models with better engines.

  6. #6
    Senior Member N4521U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Botany Bay
    Posts
    5,597
    Country
    Australia
    Country II
    United States
    Wasn't there someone on the other side of the big river suggested Spitfires?

    Planes are so simple....... damned helicopter builds!



  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,002
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Quote Originally Posted by N4521U View Post
    Wasn't there someone on the other side of the big river suggested Spitfires?
    Range is far too short.

    Steve

  8. #8
    Creator of Interesting Threads tomo pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,592
    Country
    Croatia
    Hello, Dave,

    The plane should be a single engined job, and available in numbers in 1940 vs. the West

    I agree with SR6, a plane of, maybe, Spitfire's size would not be too much for the DB-601A, with fuel of some 130-140 US gals.
    What would I do is to make it an 8 LMG fighter, 4 MG-15s in the wing roots, 4 outboard of the prop disc (so it's similar to the FW-190 weaponry layout, 2 LMGs in lieu of 1 wing cannon, but no hull guns). Maybe 500 rounds per gun. All fuel going between pilot and engine, so the plane looks like Fiat G.55 in side elevation.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Juha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Helsinki
    Posts
    3,077
    Country
    Finland
    Quote Originally Posted by GregP View Post
    I...If I had to pcik an existing German plane to be developed, without modifications as suggested above, I'd say the Heinkel He 112 shoed great potential, but the RLM hated Ernst Heinkel. I WOULD say the he 100, but I don;t think the plane was ready for production or combat as it existed at the time. The He 112, on the other hand, coule EASILY have been ready and available if the proposed Me 109 improvement is not in the spirit of the post.
    Did the RLM hate Ernst Heinkel? But at least head of RLM, Milch, heartly disliked Willy Messerschmitt ever since the M20 airliner crashes in late 20s. That was the main reason why Willy chose to make Bf 109 so radical, heavy wing loading for its time, slats etc. He knew that if his design wasn't clearly better Milch would have driven hard for selection of another competitor.

    Juha

  10. #10
    Senior Member Juha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Helsinki
    Posts
    3,077
    Country
    Finland
    As a conservative I'd say that a Bf 109E with a drop tank possibility and Fw 187 single seater as an escort fighter if it had enough range. I'd have diverted most of Bf 110 production to Fw 187 and kept only Bf 110C recon version even if that would have complicated logistics.

    Juha

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,002
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Quote Originally Posted by Juha View Post
    As a conservative I'd say that a Bf 109E with a drop tank
    Juha
    Me too. Introduce the E-7 earlier. It could easily have been done,it's a simple plumbing job. Who knows what difference that would have made in 1940.
    Steve

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    404
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Country II
    Europe
    Quote Originally Posted by Juha View Post
    As a conservative I'd say that a Bf 109E with a drop tank possibility
    +1.

    I'd also look to push the FW190 program (insisting on the l/c DB601 in some early prototypes).
    I'm not sure you can rope an expanded engine program into this (re 601's/603's) but considering the number of prototypes & sub-types the Germans indulged in it is a bit of a surprise we never see much of an early l/c engined FW190 or a bigger (bigger-winged) Me109.

    In fact as versitile & adaptable as the Me109 was it is surprising to see how the contemporary Spitfire was developed compared, by the mk14 on almost into a new plane (and in fact in the Spiteful became one) .
    The philosophy of making the air-frame as tiny as possible was fine with trying to maximise & capitalise on the engine power available in 1935/6 but it was doing the Me little favours 5yrs later when the design was probably close to the end of its substantive development (the impressive final hurrah in the K model aside).

    (on 2nd thoughts I suppose you could point to the Me 209, not the record breaker, as the upgrading of the Me 109)
    Last edited by Gixxerman; 07-18-2012 at 12:13 PM.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,499
    Country
    United States
    The Germans have a real problem in 1940 and it is with the guns. Drop tanks would help but they still need more fighters, It does little good to have fuel for 10-15minutes more combat if the wing guns are empty and the armament is down to the cowl 7.9mm machine guns. The 60 round drums for the MG/FF are too small. The Germans might need to relay fighters even with drop tanks to make sure that the escorts have enough ammo.

    This is a big part of the problem with a single seat Fw 187 in 1940. After 6-8 seconds the cannon are out of ammo. Not so bad on a point defense interceptor 30 minutes from base. Not so good on an escort fighter 90 minutes from base.

  14. #14
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,382
    Country
    United States

    Airframe alone will not produce an Uber fighter

    You need an Uber engine also. I have presented two possible solutions to that issue.

    1. Build the DB601 in large numbers (i.e. similiar to Jumo 211) so Germany can afford to produce a twin engine day fighter.
    The Fw-187 is an obvious choice for that role.

    2. Provide full support for the DB603 engine program rather then cancelling it during 1937.
    Engine development time is difficult to predict. Daimler-Benz had a 1,500 hp prototype running at the time funding was cut off. It's entirely possible that engine will pass a 100 hour endurance test before 1940. Even if the original (1940) production model DB603 engine is good for only 1,500 hp that's still a big leap in performance over the 1,100 hp DB601A.

    IMO the Fw-190 airframe is the obvious choice for the DB603 engine as it's the engine Dr Tank always wanted. However you could use this powerful engine in any airframe large enough to hold it. If Messerschmitt has confidence that RLM supports the DB603 engine they could design something similiar to the Me-309 to make use of it.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    639
    Country
    Germany
    If I had free choice of engine I'd say 190 with a DB601 and annular radiator. Switch to DB603 in 1942 should be rather smooth given the fighter gets priority for that engine.

    Other than that Germany had a good fighter for 1940-42 and a good one in the pipe for 1942-43, even with BMW801 (which gets far too worse credit than it deserves). The failure to follow on with a decent medium-to-high altitude, 1750+ PS engine for 1943-1945 was their problem.

    As for armament: Who had a really good armament for 1940? Certainly not the RAF and the VVS not really either. It was a period where everyone realized rifle calibre mgs are not a great option for a fighter aircraft and Germany arguably had one of the best solutions in the pipe with the MG151.
    Last edited by riacrato; 07-18-2012 at 01:46 PM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 44
    Last Post: 09-19-2012, 02:13 PM
  2. This Day in the Battle of Britain
    By Njaco in forum WW2 General
    Replies: 466
    Last Post: 07-07-2012, 09:00 PM
  3. Replies: 237
    Last Post: 10-26-2011, 09:50 AM
  4. Replies: 521
    Last Post: 12-22-2006, 05:45 PM
  5. The Best Bf - 109 Variant ?
    By lesofprimus in forum Old Threads
    Replies: 522
    Last Post: 07-12-2005, 11:35 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88