![]() |
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Adelaide
Posts: 32
| help with info on the boomerang i have heard alot of good and bad things about the boomerang but they were from bad sources. can you guys give me some pics and info on it. Thanks in advance. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 6,736
| Well the engine was underpowered but she was very manouverable. heres some detail pictures.. ![]() ![]() this link will give you a good amount of info, CAC CA-12 Boomerang Cockpit, Engine and Fuselage Details by Brett Green theres a fair bit out there. I've got some books i could scan some stuff if your interested... cheers heinz
__________________ |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Queensland
Posts: 4,543
| As a fighter the Boomerang was lacking with it's slow speed and altitude performance, however at low level, it performed well with excellent manoeuvrability, good climb rate, decent range and good armament. It was at low level that the Boomerang excelled in its role of army co-op/ ground attack. It was ideal for zipping in and around valleys and mountains marking targets with either smoke or tracer fire for other a/c. In this role it gained an excellent reputation in what was dangerous work. powerplant P&W 1200hp twin wasp Armament 2x 20mm cannon, 4x .303 machine guns Normal gross weight 7699lb service ceiling 34 000ft normal range 930 miles max range (with drop tank) 1600 miles max speed - sea level 277mph max speed - 7 400ft 302mph max speed - 15 500ft 305mph max speed - 27 000ft 270mph max speed - 30 000ft 260mph cruising speed (15 000ft) 190mph cruising speed (10 000ft) 175mph climb rate (7368lb) 2 940ft/min climb rate (7699lb) 2 150ft/min time to climb to 10000ft 4min time to climb to 15000ft 6.4min time to climb to 20000ft 9.2min time to climb to 25000ft 13.2min time to climb to 30000ft 19.9min total built 250 in 4 varients
__________________ |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 6,736
| Nice Wildcat! As per usual top information and great shots!
__________________ |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Siggy Master ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Poland
Posts: 13,972
| Great stuff there. Do you have any decent cut away of the Boomerang?
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 6,736
| Heres a link for a tech drawing http://membres.lycos.fr/wings2/3vues/ca12_3v.jpg I've got this someone on my comp think.....
__________________ |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 6,736
| and a good shot of the frame work, ( this is not far from me )
__________________ |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 6,736
| done some more digging and searching........
__________________ |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 6,736
| Heres another good link more recent shots of the airworthy Boomerangs around Clyde North Aeronautical Preservation Group - CNAPG.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Queensland
Posts: 4,543
| Some clips YouTube - Restored WW2 c.a.c Boomerang YouTube - Restored ww2 C.A.C Boomerang fighter aircraft
__________________ |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 6,736
| Nice vids........ I think the first one is at Tyabb literally about 5 mins from my house. I was there if it is......
__________________ |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Adelaide
Posts: 510
| Boomerangs are so cool haha. They have character. I believe they were a failure as a fighter, but supporting troops in a ground attack role they were highly effective. How about this question, what was a better plane the Wirraway or Boomerang?
__________________ |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 6,736
| Boomerang clearly The wirraway was a rather dangerous plane, infact I was reading a book recently and not one of the Australian pilots who trained with them had a good word to say. Some tended to seize in flight and for whatever reason they decided to make the rudder pedals further foward than in the texan so Shorter pilots needed wooden blocks to reach them
__________________ |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Queensland
Posts: 4,543
| Quote:
The Wirrawy also has the distinction of training the many thousands of RAAF aircrew, something the Boomerang obviously did not do.
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Siggy Master ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Poland
Posts: 13,972
| Guys,I've found there some more interesting infos on RAAF equipment,Thanks a lot. It remainds me one of pilots from my former squadron.He was short and when he was getting into Lim 6bis cockpit a technical crew had to set the rudder pedals closer and put a small pillow on its seat.
__________________ ![]() Last edited by Wurger; 04-26-2007 at 02:15 PM. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |