Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2009, 11:38 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 42
Question on M.S.406

Sorry for such question maybe stupid, but I really want to know it.

Some aeroplane equipped engine same as Morane-Saulnier 406 like Dewoitine 520, but I saw a tiny inlet is very closely behind the propeller on M.S. 406. which cause the engine nacelle of M.S.406 looks like a beer belly.
So there is my question, why the engine nacelle of M.S.406 is so ugly? what's the tiny inlet work for?

Thank you in advance.
rousseau is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 12:24 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Clay_Allison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 923
All around that may be the ugliest monoplane of the war outside of Poland's parasol-winged joke and the sad stupid-looking P-26 Peashooter.
Clay_Allison is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 12:50 AM   #3
Member
 
Fokker D21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 62
First of all questions are never stupid, not asking is.

If you are referring to the small intake just below the propeller, it is the oil cooler (Radiateur d'huile) which is located directly underneath the forward part of the engine.
__________________
Ceteris Paribus (meaning everything else is considered to have no influence on our investigation)

http://members.tele2.nl/harmstolk/gunpower.htm

Last edited by Fokker D21; 01-29-2009 at 12:53 AM.
Fokker D21 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 04:45 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,081
G'day rousseau.

I agree with "Fokker D21," the oil cooler. A couple of pics to help identify your "beer belly"...


Graeme is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 09:57 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Milos Sijacki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Serbia
Posts: 418
Nice pics. Agree with You guys, OIL COOLER.

As long as we are talking about this plane, can someone tell me what was its combat history and what was it like in combat?

Cheers
__________________
They shall be my finest warriors,
these men who give of themselves to me.
Like clay I shall mould them,
and in the furnace of war forge them.

The Emperor of Mankind
Milos Sijacki is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 09:59 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
davebender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 611
Sad stupid-looking P-26 Peashooter

Off topic but...
What's wrong with the P-26? Was there anything better during 1933 when the P-26 first entered service with the U.S. Army Air Corps?
davebender is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 10:30 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milos Sijacki View Post
As long as we are talking about this plane, can someone tell me what was its combat history and what was it like in combat?
The French had more of these than anything else at the outbreak of war, the contract was placed in early 1938 and production started in late 1938.

The first example flew 70 years ago today!

By the start of hostilities they had about 550 on strength.
It didn't fare well against the Luftwaffe, the Bf109 outclassed it. It was underpowered at around 300mph and despite the presence of the 20mm cannon was weakly armed. In the short war for the French, just under 400 were lost to about 180 kills in return.
The Luftwaffe themselves took on the remainder of the MS406 fighters, using it for training and I've seen box-art suggesting it was used in combat (Revell 1/32 Supermarine Seafire smoking a Morane-Saulnier 406 in Luftwaffe colours) but I'm not suggesting for a minute that that is a reliable source.
Foreign buyers and benefactors seemed to do better with the type than France did, the Finns used it in their war and one of their aces achieved over a dozen kills in a 406.
Colin1 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 12:13 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Captain Dunsel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Near McGuire AFB, NJ
Posts: 165
Quote:
All around that may be the ugliest monoplane of the war outside of Poland's parasol-winged joke and the sad stupid-looking P-26 Peashooter.
As DaveBender said about the P-26. Likewise, the PZL's were the hottest thing in the skies when they came out. The PZL-24 was faster than the Gladiators, for example, and much better armed.

The Poles and Greeks (plus others) did pretty well with the PZL series.

Oh, and how about the Peashooters that saw combat with China and in the Phillipines?

CD
Captain Dunsel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 12:29 PM   #9
Member
 
Fokker D21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 62
I wonder why the MS 406 had a semi retractable radiator. Was it supposed to boost speed under certain conditions?
__________________
Ceteris Paribus (meaning everything else is considered to have no influence on our investigation)

http://members.tele2.nl/harmstolk/gunpower.htm
Fokker D21 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 12:53 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Venganza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 386
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fokker D21 View Post
I wonder why the MS 406 had a semi retractable radiator. Was it supposed to boost speed under certain conditions?
Probably, to reduce drag under certain flight regimes. And let's face it, the M.S. 406 needed all the help it could get.

Venganza
__________________
"It's such a fine line between stupid and clever."

-Spinal Tap
Venganza is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 12:55 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
parsifal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,991
MS 406s under Finnish control enjoyed considerable success. They were also used in some numbers by the Turks and the Swiss.

From memorythe french lost about 200 in the air (and many more on the ground) whilst achieving about 100 Kills themselves....not an impressive record. I think around 450 were lost during the BOF.

Three (I think) were shipped to Indochina, where they fought in the war with Siam in 1940-41. They appear to have held their own against the H-75 (N) and Hawks of the RTAF
__________________
Do not judge on abilities, but on choices
parsifal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 02:04 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Venganza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 386
Quote:
Originally Posted by parsifal View Post
MS 406s under Finnish control enjoyed considerable success.
Parsifal, didn't the Finns re-engine or modify them in some way to make them more effective? I remember they called some of theirs the "Morko-Morane". Were these the modified versions?

Venganza
__________________
"It's such a fine line between stupid and clever."

-Spinal Tap
Venganza is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 02:57 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Marshall_Stack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by Venganza View Post
Probably, to reduce drag under certain flight regimes. And let's face it, the M.S. 406 needed all the help it could get.

Venganza
Interesting idea. I guess this is used in lieu of cowl flaps?
Marshall_Stack is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 03:12 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
davebender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 611
Ms406 didn't fare well against the Luftwaffe

Britain fought an undeclared war against France from July 1940 onward. The USA joined the fight against France during the fall of 1942. How did the Ms.406 fare in places like Dakar, Syria, Morocco, Algeria and Madagascar?
davebender is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 06:16 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Milos Sijacki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Serbia
Posts: 418
Thanks for the info Colin1.
__________________
They shall be my finest warriors,
these men who give of themselves to me.
Like clay I shall mould them,
and in the furnace of war forge them.

The Emperor of Mankind
Milos Sijacki is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118