Clay_Allison
Staff Sergeant
- 1,154
- Dec 24, 2008
I'd probably be willing to trade 250hp at sea level to get it back up high if it meant having a few squadrons capable of "bouncing" 109s from above in North Africa. Remember I'm also suggesting stripping it of all armor and two guns to get its rate of climb up. It would be well worth it to me just to let the Germans and Japanese know that they were not guaranteed an altitude advantade.That may be true but how much low altitude performance do you want to give up?
You still have to take-off and climb to combat altitude.
Some of the later P-40s did trade 125hp at take-off for an extra 100 or so hp at 20,000ft. if you want several hundred HP than that several thousand feet higher then you are going to loose several hunderd more HP at sea level. Take- off and low altitude climb using less than 1000hp isn't going to impress too many peaple.
You know it's a damned shame that we didn't have P-47s available in the early phases of the war. The Jug was in its element at 35k feet with that turbocharger. No axis fighter pilot ever wanted to see a P-47 above them. You could beat one when you had energy or you were down on the deck, but fighting them from below meant he had all the cards.