Reno Racers

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

spicmart

Staff Sergeant
789
142
May 11, 2008
Reno Racers are truly the pinnacle development of piston-powered propeller fighters.
Maybe we can discuss here the specific airplanes and the modification made to push their performance envelope?
 
Well they aren't pushing the envelope of height, speed endurance and agility, they are creating a special envelope which means in the limit they are only good for a Reno race.
 
Reno Racers are truly the pinnacle development of piston-powered propeller fighters.
Maybe we can discuss here the specific airplanes and the modification made to push their performance envelope?


Having spent much of my adult life around Racing and Racers, I'm interested in any discussion of them. I certainly have an interest in WWII history and such, but my real fascination is with the post war to present use, modification, and restoration of these remarkable machines. If a major goal back then was speed, then racing, getting the most speed out of an airframe possible, becomes really interesting!

3800 horsepower Merlins, Griffon Mustangs, 500 mph Merlin Mustangs -- I love it all...

Sisu
Altitude for Reno is ~5000ft.
_DSC3023 for web text.jpg
R03  1st  Monday      NN  762 .jpg
 
That's what I meant, the height is the height above Reno, payload is zero, range is "take off complete the course and land". I believe on some even the direction of turn is optimised so they turn quicker or better in the course direction than they would in reverse.

Is the wing shorter on the Port side?
Just askin.
 
I have great memories of crewing at Reno. It really is a whole different experience! Thanks for the welcome. I've been lurking here for a while, but seeing a racing thread is what got me to actually join in.
View attachment 615891

Bob Love and John Crocker.
Did some lettering on both, ^ when it went dark blue tail.
Flew with Russ when he owned Bernis Bo.
 
Is the wing shorter on the Port side?
Just askin.


No, the clips have always been symmetrical, despite occasional rumours otherwise. I think an asymmetrical clip might be a poor idea, given the sheer violence of the Reno experience. If you get flipped upside down at 450 mph 200 feet off the ground in the wake turbulence of a Sea Fury and have to push out of your situation I think you want totally predictable response from your airplane. I think wings of different lengths could be a real issue...

Clipping a P-51 is actually surprisingly simple and reversible. The spar does not go to the wingtip -- there is a production break and a bolt on wingtip section. To go racing you just unbolt the wingtip section, remove the aileron and put on a racing wingtip and a shortened aileron. Clipping a Sea Fury, for instance, would be far more difficult and would be wildly expensive and difficult to reverse. There has been just one Sea fury clipped wing, and it has been traded around among owners over the last 45 years. Nobody has ever tried to rebuild that wing to stock.
 
Back when I went to Reno, I went primarily for the AT6/SNJ portion. I only went for a few years. I saw Art Scholl's last performance and then read the news that he was killed the next day during "Top Gun" filming. Bob Hoover also had amazing performances back then. I was honored to meet Bob Love at Lemoore NAS one year along with several other people who used to race.
 
Last edited:
Back when I went to Reno, I went primarily for the AT6/SNJ portion.

I did the Tassie Devil on Screamin Deamon on the T-6 for Stu Eberhardt and on Merlins Magic P-51. It was good times for me way back then.
 
Those were good times back then. We were all still fairly young and energetic. I still remember the one time that I saw Precious Metal race. The plane developed engine trouble and had to belly in at the dry lake bed area. Contra-rotating props do make an unusual sound. I have a large part of the Racing Planes and air races collection by Reed Kinert.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back