ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 503

The Ta-152.... The Best High Altitude Fighter?????

Aviation Discuss The Ta-152.... The Best High Altitude Fighter????? in the World War II - Aviation forums; Many have said its the best piston driven high altitude fighter of the War... Whats everyones take???...

  1. #1
    Senior Member lesofprimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Long Island Native in Mississippi
    Posts
    19,141
    Country
    United States

    The Ta-152.... The Best High Altitude Fighter?????

    Many have said its the best piston driven high altitude fighter of the War... Whats everyones take???

    Last edited by lesofprimus; 11-15-2006 at 04:59 PM.




  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    It has to be the best...The Westland Welking could have been pretty effective too though me thinks...

  3. #3
    Senior Member lesofprimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Long Island Native in Mississippi
    Posts
    19,141
    Country
    United States
    Never heard of that airplane.....

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Westland Welkin: Twin Engined High altitude fighter just entering service towards the end of the war. It looks pretty similar to the Whirlwind and although its perfomance wasnt quite so good as the Ta-152, It was probably a lot tougher. Ill have to do some research on it later and post more.

  5. #5
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    ah yes the welkin, how can you not know about that one, me and CC know her well................

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Yup, and to think we doubted its existance...


  7. #7
    Senior Member lesofprimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Long Island Native in Mississippi
    Posts
    19,141
    Country
    United States
    Never heard about it before..... I never really did get into post-war or prototype planes.....

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    It wasnt post war or prototype...it actually did see service.

  9. #9
    Senior Member lesofprimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Long Island Native in Mississippi
    Posts
    19,141
    Country
    United States
    HMMM.... I musta been in the shiithouse when that topic came up.....

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Ever notice how I say ill do stuff and then dont? Well, I will get some more info on this tomorrow, cos im sure it was developed especially to combat high altitude fighters like the Ta-152 and im sure it saw service...

  11. #11
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Something around 150 TA-152 airframes were started. Of these, about 80 were completed, and less than 50 were delivered, and as best I've been able to find, it seems likely only about 30-40 of these were deployed. Those that were deployed only flew a very few sorties, and little is known about how they would have fared in combat had the type been in any substantial amount of combat.

    The TA-152H had a very strange wing design. It was twisted, with the inner wing having more attack than near the tips. This was done to allow it to stall fight at very high altitudes. When the plane is in a climb and starts to stall, theoretically part of the wing will still have airflow and provide some roll control. The price for this would clearly be buffeting at high speeds, especially at lower altitudes. General roll performance was also not up to FW190 standards (the best). Finally, the SEP system on this plane was an odd setup that could be used for fast climbs and maybe to exit combat, but it was not something that would be very likely to be useful in combat. The engine has to be at the right RPM to engage it, and the load on the prop has to be sufficient to prevent the engine from reving up from there, the pitch being increased as the power comes on.

    The few sucesses this plane had (and some of these are dubious) really do not tell us much, because the TA-152 pilots had a very good idea of the capabilities of the planes they were fighting, where the Allied pilots had never seen or even heard of a TA-152. Until a plane like this is proven in battle over a reasonable period of time, you just don't know if it was really any good or not.

    =S=

    Lunatic

  12. #12
    Senior Member lesofprimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Long Island Native in Mississippi
    Posts
    19,141
    Country
    United States
    Captured planes tell a different story..... It was better than any piston driven plane in WWII.... Americans and Brits alike agreed....

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    And I thought over 400 Ta-152's were built?

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Westland Welkin.

    The Welkin was a twin-engine heavy fighter from the Westland Aircraft company, designed to fight at extremely high altitudes in the stratosphere. It was created in response to the arrival of modified Junkers Ju 86 bombers flying reconnaissance missions which suggested the Luftwaffe might attempt to re-open bombing of England at high altitudes. In the end this threat never materialized, and the Welkin was produced only in small numbers.

    The Welkin was essentially a modified Whirlwind, fitted with a much larger wing, new engines in the form of Rolls Royce Merlin 76/77's, and a pressurized cockpit. The last item required the majority of the effort in designing the Welkin. After extensive development a new cockpit was developed that was built out of heavy-gauge duraluminum bolted directly to the front of the main spar. The cockpit hood used an internal layer of thick perspex to hold the pressure, and an outer thin layer to form a smooth line. Heated air was blown between the two to keep the canopy clear of frost.

    When the pressurization system was driven by a Rotol supercharger attached to the left-hand engine, providing a constant pressure of 3.5 lb/in² (24 kPa) over the exterior pressure. This resulted in an apparent altitude of 24,000 ft (7,300 m) when the plane was operating at its design altitude of 45,000 ft (13,700 m). This apparent altitude is still too high for normal breathing, the pilot still had to wear an oxygen mask during flight. A rubber gasket filled with the pressurized air sealed the canopy when the system was turned on, and a valve ensured the pressure was controlled automatically.

    Other than that, changes were minor. The wings were so large that the Fowler flaps used on the Whirlwind weren't needed, and were replaced by a simple split-flap. The extra wing area also required more stability, so the tail was lengthened to provide more arm.

    By the time the plane was complete and rolling off the line, it was apparent that the Germans had lost interest in the high-altitude mission, due largely to successful interceptions by specially modified Supermarine Spitfires. In the end only 75 Welkins were produced. A two seat version known as the Welkin Mk. II was produced in only two examples.


    Role - High altitude heavy fighter
    Crew - 1
    First Flight - NA
    Entered Service - NA
    Manufacturer - Westland

    Dimensions
    Length - 32 ft 3 in
    Wingspan - 70 ft
    Height - 16 ft
    Wing Area - 250 ft²

    Weights
    Empty - 8,310 lb
    Loaded - NA
    Maximum Takeoff - 11,410 lb
    Capacity - NA

    Powerplant
    Engines - 2 x Rolls-Royce Merlin 76
    Power - NA

    Performance
    Maximum Speed - 385 mph
    Combat Range - NA
    Ferry Range - 1,500 miles
    Service Ceiling - 45,000 ft
    Rate of Climb - NA
    Wing Loading - 38 lb/ft²
    Thrust/Weight - NA
    Power/Mass - NA

    Armament
    Guns - 4 x 20 mm cannons
    Bombs - NA
    Missiles - NA
    Rockets - NA
    Other - NA




    So It appears that it was much earlier in the war than I thought and not designed to take on German high-altitude fighters...shame it never made it, I think this could have been a great plane.

  15. #15
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by lesofprimus
    Captured planes tell a different story..... It was better than any piston driven plane in WWII.... Americans and Brits alike agreed....
    All I'm aware of is one ferry flight where the pilot said he liked the plane, but did not put it through any extreme manuvers or push the engine. Would you care to provide some sources, I'm open to new info.

    =S=

    Lunatic

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86